Using undeclared symbol k in an expression in the following
array constructor results in an ICE:
print *, [real(x(k))]
If the call to the intrinsic is not in a constructor a no IMPLICIT
type error is reported and the ICE does not occur.
Matching on an expression instead of an initialisation express an
and not converting a MATCH_ERROR return value into MATCH_NO results
in the no IMPLICIT error and no ICE.
Note: Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org> is the author of the
changes except for the test cases.
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/93484
* match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): Replace gfc_match_init_expr with
gfc_match_expr. Return m if m is MATCH_NO or MATCH_ERROR.
gcc/testsuite
PR fortran/93484
* gfortran.dg/pr93484_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr93484_2.f90: New test.
+2020-03-25 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/93484
+ * match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): Replace gfc_match_init_expr with
+ gfc_match_expr. Return m if m is MATCH_NO or MATCH_ERROR.
+
2020-03-23 Mark Eggleston <mark.eggleston@codethink.com>
Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
found:
- m = gfc_match_init_expr (&e);
+ m = gfc_match_expr (&e);
if (m == MATCH_NO || m == MATCH_ERROR)
- return MATCH_NO;
+ return m;
/* If a comma appears, it is an intrinsic subprogram. */
gfc_gobble_whitespace ();
+2020-03-25 Mark Eggleston <mark.eggleston@codethink.com>
+
+ PR fortran/93484
+ * gfortran.dg/pr93484_1.f90: New test.
+ * gfortran.dg/pr93484_2.f90: New test.
+
2020-03-25 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/94303
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+program p
+ implicit none
+ integer :: x(4) = [1,2,3,4]
+ print *, [real(x(k))] ! { dg-error "Symbol 'k' at .1. has no IMPLICIT type" }
+end
+
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+program p
+ implicit none
+ integer, parameter :: x(4) = [1,2,3,4]
+ print *, [real(x(k))] ! { dg-error "Symbol 'k' at .1. has no IMPLICIT type" }
+end
+