+2012-06-05 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
+
+ * gdb.base/ctxobj-f.c (GET_VERSION): Introduce local variable
+ and add comment.
+ * gdb.base/ctxobj-m.c (main): Rewrite, and add comment.
+ * gdb.base/ctxobj.exp: Insert breakpoint in ctxobj-f.c using
+ "STOP" marker. Adjust testing strategy to make it work on
+ all targets.
+
+ * gdb.base/print-file-var-main.c (main): Rewrite using local
+ variables and adjust get_version_2's return value check.
+ Add small comment.
+ * gdb.base/print-file-var.exp: Insert breakpoint using "STOP"
+ marker. Adjust testing strategy to make it work on all targets.
+
2012-06-05 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* gdb.ada/bad-task-bp-keyword: New testcase.
int
GET_VERSION (void)
{
- return this_version_num;
+ int v = this_version_num;
+
+ if (v > 999)
+ v = 999;
+
+ return v; /* STOP */
}
int
main (void)
{
- if (get_version_1 () != 104)
+ int v1 = get_version_1 ();
+ int v2 = get_version_2 ();
+
+ if (v1 != 104)
return 1;
- if (get_version_2 () != 203)
+ /* The value returned by get_version_2 depends on the target.
+ On GNU/Linux, for instance, it should return 104. But on
+ x86-windows, for instance, it will return 203. */
+ if (v2 != 104 && v2 != 203)
return 2;
return 0;
return -1
}
-gdb_breakpoint "get_version_1"
+set bp_location [gdb_get_line_number "STOP" "ctxobj-f.c"]
+gdb_test "break ctxobj-f.c:$bp_location" \
+ "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at 0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+: .*" \
+ "break in get_version functions"
+
gdb_test "continue" \
"Breakpoint $decimal, get_version_1 \\(\\).*" \
"continue to get_version_1"
# Try printing "this_version_num". There are two global variables
-# with that name, but we should pick the one in the shared library
-# we are currently debugging. We will know we picked the correct one
-# if the value printed is 104. The first print test verifies that
-# we're doing things right when the partial symtab hasn't been
-# expanded. And the second print test will do the same, but after
-# the partial symtab has been expanded.
-
-gdb_test "print this_version_num" \
- " = 104" \
+# with that name, and some systems such as GNU/Linux merge them
+# into one single entity, while some other systems such as Windows
+# keep them separate. In the first situation, we have to verify
+# that GDB does not randomly select the wrong instance. And in
+# the second case, we have to verify that GDB prints the value
+# of the instance from the current debugging context (the shared
+# library currently being debugged).
+#
+# We perform two tests: The first print test verifies that we are
+# doing things right when the partial symtab hasn't been expanded.
+# And the second print test will do the same, but after the partial
+# symtab has been expanded.
+#
+# To avoid adding target-specific code in this testcase, the program
+# sets a local variable named 'v' with the value of the global
+# variable 'this_version_number'. This allows us to compare the value
+# that GDB thinks 'this_version_num' has, against the actual value
+# seen by the program itself.
+
+gdb_test "print this_version_num == v" \
+ " = 1" \
"print libctxobj1's this_version_num from partial symtab"
-gdb_test "print this_version_num" \
- " = 104" \
+gdb_test "print this_version_num == v" \
+ " = 1" \
"print libctxobj1's this_version_num from symtab"
# Do the same, but from get_version_2.
-gdb_breakpoint "get_version_2"
gdb_test "continue" \
"Breakpoint $decimal, get_version_2 \\(\\).*" \
"continue to get_version_2"
-gdb_test "print this_version_num" \
- " = 203" \
+gdb_test "print this_version_num == v" \
+ " = 1" \
"print libctxobj2's this_version_num from partial symtab"
-gdb_test "print this_version_num" \
- " = 203" \
+gdb_test "print this_version_num == v" \
+ " = 1" \
"print libctxobj2's this_version_num from symtab"
int
main (void)
{
- if (get_version_1 () != 104)
+ int v1 = get_version_1 ();
+ int v2 = get_version_2 ();
+
+ if (v1 != 104) /* STOP */
return 1;
- if (get_version_2 () != 104)
+ /* The value returned by get_version_2 depends on the target system. */
+ if (v2 != 104 || v2 != 203)
return 2;
+
return 0;
}
return -1
}
-gdb_test "print 'print-file-var-lib1.c'::this_version_id" \
- " = 104"
+# Try printing "this_version_num" qualified with the name of the file
+# where the variables are defined. There are two global variables
+# with that name, and some systems such as GNU/Linux merge them
+# into one single entity, while some other systems such as Windows
+# keep them separate. In the first situation, we have to verify
+# that GDB does not randomly select the wrong instance, even when
+# a specific filename is used to qualified the lookup. And in the
+# second case, we have to verify that GDB does select the instance
+# defined in the given filename.
+#
+# To avoid adding target-specific code in this testcase, the program
+# sets two local variable named 'v1' and 'v2' with the value of
+# our global variables. This allows us to compare the value that
+# GDB returns for each query against the actual value seen by
+# the program itself.
+
+# Get past the initialization of variables 'v1' and 'v2'.
+
+set bp_location \
+ [gdb_get_line_number "STOP" "${executable}.c"]
+gdb_test "break $executable.c:$bp_location" \
+ "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at 0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+: .*" \
+ "breapoint past v1 & v2 initialization"
+
+gdb_test "continue" \
+ "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, main \\(\\) at.*" \
+ "continue to STOP marker"
+
+# Now check the value of this_version_id in both print-file-var-lib1.c
+# and print-file-var-lib2.c.
+
+gdb_test "print 'print-file-var-lib1.c'::this_version_id == v1" \
+ " = 1"
-gdb_test "print 'print-file-var-lib2.c'::this_version_id" \
- " = 203"
+gdb_test "print 'print-file-var-lib2.c'::this_version_id == v2" \
+ " = 1"