*** empty log message ***
authorCharles Hannum <mycroft@gnu.org>
Wed, 24 Jun 1992 04:15:46 +0000 (04:15 +0000)
committerCharles Hannum <mycroft@gnu.org>
Wed, 24 Jun 1992 04:15:46 +0000 (04:15 +0000)
From-SVN: r1265

gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h

index 5992413a3fc8a0a5e447d3244bfb89d64d64b708..bac364b87552ef8f74abca42ef7e61eb09c98827 100644 (file)
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ do { long value[2];                                                 \
    have a precedent to follow with respect to DWARF register numbers
    for x86 FP registers, but the SDB on x86/svr4 is so completely
    broken with respect to FP registers that it is hardly worth thinking
-   of it as something to strive for compatability with.
+   of it as something to strive for compatibility with.
 
    The verison of x86/svr4 SDB I have at the moment does (partially)
    seem to believe that DWARF register number 11 is associated with