2013-03-16 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+ PR c++/54764
+ PR c++/55972
+ * name-lookup.h (tag_scope): Add ts_lambda.
+ * semantics.c (begin_lambda_type): Use it.
+ * decl.c (xref_tag_1): Set CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR.
+ * pt.c (check_default_tmpl_args): Ignore lambdas.
+ (push_template_decl_real): Handle lambdas.
+ * tree.c (no_linkage_check): Adjust lambda check.
+
PR c++/56039
* tree.c (strip_typedefs_expr): Complain about lambda, don't abort.
static tree
xref_tag_1 (enum tag_types tag_code, tree name,
- tag_scope scope, bool template_header_p)
+ tag_scope orig_scope, bool template_header_p)
{
enum tree_code code;
tree t;
tree context = NULL_TREE;
+ tag_scope scope;
gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (name) == IDENTIFIER_NODE);
gcc_unreachable ();
}
+ if (orig_scope == ts_lambda)
+ scope = ts_current;
+ else
+ scope = orig_scope;
+
/* In case of anonymous name, xref_tag is only called to
make type node and push name. Name lookup is not required. */
if (ANON_AGGRNAME_P (name))
{
t = make_class_type (code);
TYPE_CONTEXT (t) = context;
+ if (orig_scope == ts_lambda)
+ /* Remember that we're declaring a lambda to avoid bogus errors
+ in push_template_decl. */
+ CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (t) = error_mark_node;
t = pushtag (name, t, scope);
}
}
ts_global = 1, /* All scopes. This is the 3.4.1
[basic.lookup.unqual] lookup mentioned
in [basic.lookup.elab]/2. */
- ts_within_enclosing_non_class = 2 /* Search within enclosing non-class
+ ts_within_enclosing_non_class = 2, /* Search within enclosing non-class
only, for friend class lookup
according to [namespace.memdef]/3
and [class.friend]/9. */
+ ts_lambda = 3 /* Declaring a lambda closure. */
} tag_scope;
typedef struct GTY(()) cp_class_binding {
local scope. */
return true;
+ if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TYPE_DECL
+ && TREE_TYPE (decl)
+ && LAMBDA_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)))
+ /* A lambda doesn't have an explicit declaration; don't complain
+ about the parms of the enclosing class. */
+ return true;
+
if (current_class_type
&& !TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (current_class_type)
&& DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (decl)
if (!ctx
|| TREE_CODE (ctx) == FUNCTION_DECL
|| (CLASS_TYPE_P (ctx) && TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (ctx))
+ || (TREE_CODE (decl) == TYPE_DECL
+ && LAMBDA_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)))
|| (is_friend && !DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (decl)))
{
if (DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (decl)
/* Create the new RECORD_TYPE for this lambda. */
type = xref_tag (/*tag_code=*/record_type,
name,
- /*scope=*/ts_within_enclosing_non_class,
+ /*scope=*/ts_lambda,
/*template_header_p=*/false);
}
if (TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_P (t))
goto ptrmem;
/* Lambda types that don't have mangling scope have no linkage. We
- check CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR here rather than LAMBDA_TYPE_P because
+ check CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR for error_mark_node because
when we get here from pushtag none of the lambda information is
set up yet, so we want to assume that the lambda has linkage and
fix it up later if not. */
if (CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (t)
+ && CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (t) != error_mark_node
&& LAMBDA_TYPE_EXTRA_SCOPE (t) == NULL_TREE)
return t;
/* Fall through. */
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/54764
+// { dg-require-effective-target c++11 }
+
+template<class T = void>
+struct c
+{
+ int (*f)(int) = [](int i){return i + i;};
+};
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/55972
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+class C
+{
+ void f();
+ int j = 10;
+ int i = [this]() { return this->j; }();
+};