Use the new inferior parameter instead of target_gdbarch. There are
still hidden references to the current context behind core_bfd and
exec_bfd, but this seemed better than nothing.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* symfile-mem.c (add_vsyscall_page): Use inferior parameter
instead of target_gdbarch.
Change-Id: Iaf5ace555ee8e46cbef5190aca1f6fe639f06677
+2020-10-24 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
+
+ * symfile-mem.c (add_vsyscall_page): Use inferior parameter
+ instead of target_gdbarch.
+
2020-10-24 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
* jit.c (jit_reader_load_command): Pass current inferior.
#include "auxv.h"
#include "elf/common.h"
#include "gdb_bfd.h"
+#include "inferior.h"
/* Verify parameters of target_read_memory_bfd and target_read_memory are
compatible. */
{
struct mem_range vsyscall_range;
- if (gdbarch_vsyscall_range (target_gdbarch (), &vsyscall_range))
+ if (gdbarch_vsyscall_range (inf->gdbarch, &vsyscall_range))
{
struct bfd *bfd;