This fixes a false-positive warning from -Wduplicate-cond in the presence of an
if-statement with a non-empty init-statement. Precisely determining whether a
non-empty init-statement has side effects seems tricky and error-prone, so this
patch takes the route of unconditionally invalidating the condition chain when
it encounters such an if-statement.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94265
* parser.c (cp_parser_selection_statement) <case RID_IF>: Invalidate the
current condition chain when the if-statement has a non-empty
init-statement.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94265
* g++.dg/warn/Wduplicated-cond1.C: New test.
+2020-03-25 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94265
+ * parser.c (cp_parser_selection_statement) <case RID_IF>: Invalidate the
+ current condition chain when the if-statement has a non-empty
+ init-statement.
+
2020-03-25 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/94319
pedwarn (cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->location, 0,
"init-statement in selection statements only available "
"with %<-std=c++17%> or %<-std=gnu++17%>");
+ if (cp_lexer_next_token_is_not (parser->lexer, CPP_SEMICOLON))
+ {
+ /* A non-empty init-statement can have arbitrary side
+ effects. */
+ delete chain;
+ chain = NULL;
+ }
cp_parser_init_statement (parser, &decl);
}
+2020-03-25 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94265
+ * g++.dg/warn/Wduplicated-cond1.C: New test.
+
2020-03-25 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/94131
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/94265
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wduplicated-cond" }
+
+void
+foo ()
+{
+ if (int a = 0; a)
+ { }
+ else if (a = 5; a) // { dg-message "previously used here" }
+ { }
+ else if (; a) // { dg-warning "duplicated .if. condition" }
+ { }
+ else if (int b = ++a; a)
+ { }
+}