+2011-08-02 Gary Dismukes <dismukes@adacore.com>
+
+ * sem_ch6.adb (Check_Conformance): Revise the check for nonconforming
+ null exclusions to test Can_Never_Be_Null on the anonymous access types
+ of the formals rather than testing the formals themselves. Exclude this
+ check in cases where the Old_Formal is marked as a controlling formal,
+ to avoid issuing spurious errors for bodies completing dispatching
+ operations (due to the flag not getting set on controlling access
+ formals in body specs).
+ (Find_Corresponding_Spec): When checking full and subtype conformance of
+ subprogram bodies in instances, pass Designated and E in that order, for
+ consistency with the expected order of the formals (New_Id followed by
+ Old_Id).
+
+2011-08-02 Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
+
+ * sem_ch8.adb: Minor reformatting.
+
2011-08-02 Ed Schonberg <schonberg@adacore.com>
* sem_ch8.adb (Analyze_Subprogram_Renaming): new procedure
-- --
-- B o d y --
-- --
--- Copyright (C) 1992-2010, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
+-- Copyright (C) 1992-2011, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
-- --
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): In case of anonymous access types check
-- the null-exclusion and access-to-constant attributes must
- -- match.
+ -- match. For null exclusion, we test the types rather than the
+ -- formals themselves, since the attribute is only set reliably
+ -- on the formals in the Ada 95 case, and we exclude the case
+ -- where Old_Formal is marked as controlling, to avoid errors
+ -- when matching completing bodies with dispatching declarations
+ -- (access formals in the bodies aren't marked Can_Never_Be_Null).
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
and then Ekind (Etype (Old_Formal)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
and then Ekind (Etype (New_Formal)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
and then
- (Can_Never_Be_Null (Old_Formal) /=
- Can_Never_Be_Null (New_Formal)
+ ((Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (Old_Formal)) /=
+ Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (New_Formal))
+ and then
+ not Is_Controlling_Formal (Old_Formal))
or else
Is_Access_Constant (Etype (Old_Formal)) /=
Is_Access_Constant (Etype (New_Formal)))
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body
and then Present (Homonym (E))
- and then not Fully_Conformant (E, Designator)
+ and then not Fully_Conformant (Designator, E)
then
goto Next_Entity;
- elsif not Subtype_Conformant (E, Designator) then
+ elsif not Subtype_Conformant (Designator, E) then
goto Next_Entity;
end if;
end if;
-- class-wide operation whose body is a dispatching call. We replace the
-- generated renaming declaration:
--
- -- procedure P (X : CT) renames P;
+ -- procedure P (X : CT) renames P;
--
-- by a different renaming and a class-wide operation:
--
- -- procedure Pr (X : T) renames P; -- renames primitive operation
- -- procedure P (X : CT); -- class-wide operation
- -- ...
- -- procedure P (X : CT) is begin Pr (X); end; -- dispatching call
-
+ -- procedure Pr (X : T) renames P; -- renames primitive operation
+ -- procedure P (X : CT); -- class-wide operation
+ -- ...
+ -- procedure P (X : CT) is begin Pr (X); end; -- dispatching call
+ --
-- This rule only applies if there is no explicit visible class-wide
-- operation at the point of the instantiation.