In this wrong-code PR the combine pass ends up moving a CC-using instruction past a *compare_cstore<mode>_insn
insn_and_split. After reload the *compare_cstore<mode>_insn splitter ends up generating a SUBS instruction that
clobbers the condition flags, and things go bad.
The solution is simple, the *compare_cstore<mode>_insn pattern should specify that it clobbers the CC register
so that combine (or any other pass) does not assume that it can move CC-using patterns across it.
This patch does that and fixes the testcase.
The testcase FAILs on GCC 8 only, but the buggy pattern is in GCC 6 onwards, so we should backport this as
a latent bug fix after it's had some time to bake in trunk.
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu.
PR target/84748
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*compare_cstore<mode>_insn): Mark pattern
as clobbering CC_REGNUM.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr84748.c: New test.
From-SVN: r258366
+2018-03-08 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
+
+ PR target/84748
+ * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*compare_cstore<mode>_insn): Mark pattern
+ as clobbering CC_REGNUM.
+
2018-03-08 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/84552
(define_insn_and_split "*compare_cstore<mode>_insn"
[(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(EQL:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
- (match_operand:GPI 2 "aarch64_imm24" "n")))]
+ (match_operand:GPI 2 "aarch64_imm24" "n")))
+ (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
"!aarch64_move_imm (INTVAL (operands[2]), <MODE>mode)
&& !aarch64_plus_operand (operands[2], <MODE>mode)
&& !reload_completed"
+2018-03-08 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
+
+ PR target/84748
+ * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr84748.c: New test.
+
2018-03-08 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR middle-end/84552
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
+
+typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
+
+int a, c, d;
+u128 b;
+
+unsigned long long g0, g1;
+
+void
+store (unsigned long long a0, unsigned long long a1)
+{
+ g0 = a0;
+ g1 = a1;
+}
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ b += a;
+ c = d != 84347;
+ b /= c;
+ u128 x = b;
+ store (x >> 0, x >> 64);
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ foo ();
+ if (g0 != 0 || g1 != 0)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ return 0;
+}