PR rtl-optimization/22167
* gcse.c (hoist_code): Fix hoist_exprs[] check.
From-SVN: r102219
+2005-07-21 Richard Sandiford <richard@codesourcery.com>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/22167
+ * gcse.c (hoist_code): Fix hoist_exprs[] check.
+
2005-07-20 Adam Nemet <anemet@lnxw.com>
* config/rs6000/lynx.h: Mark __do_global_ctors_aux and
insn_inserted_p = 0;
/* These tests should be the same as the tests above. */
- if (TEST_BIT (hoist_vbeout[bb->index], i))
+ if (TEST_BIT (hoist_exprs[bb->index], i))
{
/* We've found a potentially hoistable expression, now
we look at every block BB dominates to see if it
+2005-07-21 Richard Sandiford <richard@codesourcery.com>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/22167
+ * g++.dg/opt/pr22167.C: New test.
+
2005-07-20 Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>
PR c++/2922
--- /dev/null
+// Derived from PR22167, which failed on some RISC targets. The call to
+// foo() has two successors, one normal and one exceptional, and both
+// successors use &a[0] and x. Expressions involving &a[0] can be hoisted
+// before the call but those involving x cannot.
+// { dg-options "-Os" }
+// { dg-do run }
+
+int a[4];
+
+struct S {
+ S() : x (0) {}
+ ~S() { a[0] = x; }
+ int x;
+};
+
+void
+foo (int *x)
+{
+ if (*x == 1)
+ throw 1;
+ *x = 1;
+}
+
+int
+main()
+{
+ S s;
+ foo (&s.x);
+ if (a[0] == s.x)
+ a[0]++;
+ return a[0];
+}