I see an uninitialized variable warning (with gcc 9.3.1) from
cgen-run.c, like this:
/tmp/build/sim/../../src/sim/cris/../common/cgen-run.c: In function ‘sim_resume’:
/tmp/build/sim/../../src/sim/cris/../common/cgen-run.c:259:5: warning: ‘engine_fns$’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
259 | (* engine_fns[next_cpu_nr]) (cpu);
| ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/build/sim/../../src/sim/cris/../common/cgen-run.c:232:14: note: ‘engine_fns$’ was declared here
232 | ENGINE_FN *engine_fns[MAX_NR_PROCESSORS];
| ^~~~~~~~~~
This is a false positive - we over allocate engine_fn, and then only
initialize the nr_cpus entries which we will later go on to use.
However, we can easily silence this warning by initializing the unused
entries in engine_fns to NULL, this might also help if anyone ever
looks at engine_fns in a debugger, it should now be obvious which
entries are in use, and which are not.
With this change the warning is gone.
There should be no change in behaviour with this commit.
prime_cpu (cpu, max_insns);
}
+ /* Ensure the remaining engine_fns slots are initialized, this silences a
+ compiler warning when engine_fns is used below. */
+ for (i = nr_cpus; i < MAX_NR_PROCESSORS; ++i)
+ engine_fns[i] = NULL;
+
while (1)
{
SIM_ENGINE_PREFIX_HOOK (sd);