even an in-order single-issue implementation with a single ALU would still
appear to have parallel vectoristion.
* hard-to-judge: if actual inherent underlying ALU parallelism is added it's
- hard to say if there would be pluses or minuses. At worse it would
- be "no worse" than existing register renaming, OoO, VLIW and register
+ hard to say if there would be pluses or minuses (on die area). At worse it
+ would be "no worse" than existing register renaming, OoO, VLIW and register
file cacheing schemes.
## RVV (as it stands, Draft 0.4 Section 17, RISC-V ISA V2.3-Draft)