gdb.trace: Fix another expected message on continue.
authorMarcin Kościelnicki <koriakin@0x04.net>
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:06:08 +0000 (12:06 +0100)
committerMarcin Kościelnicki <koriakin@0x04.net>
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:16:19 +0000 (12:16 +0100)
Missed one message in bd0a71fa16f668341a9361c695bc3ca44d27b322, since it
didn't trigger on s390x or amd64 (fast tracepoint out of range due to
shared library usage), noticed on s390.

Pushed as obvious.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* gdb.trace/pending.exp: Fix expected message on continue.

gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog
gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/pending.exp

index 6ddd9ce91a1dea4891bcd9cc1b85be106b5eb07a..a25dc9b2cba2f2c249d8079afce23d2a1dfb9c3c 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2016-01-23  Marcin Kościelnicki  <koriakin@0x04.net>
+
+       * gdb.trace/pending.exp: Fix expected message on continue.
+
 2016-01-22  Marcin Kościelnicki  <koriakin@0x04.net>
 
        * tracepoint.c (write_inferior_data_ptr): Cast to uintptr_t, so that
index 98e17f7a41f233caf7dbc9a56c20ba5bdcead272..3ef752f58e5744c69a2b519860d35a8e169d045e 100644 (file)
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ proc pending_tracepoint_resolved_during_trace { trace_type } \
                fail $test
            }
        }
-       -re "Continuing.\r\n(Reading .* from remote target...\r\n)?\r\nBreakpoint.*marker.*at.*$srcfile.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+       -re "Continuing.\r\n(Reading .* from remote target...\r\n)?\r\n(Thread .* hit )?Breakpoint.*marker.*at.*$srcfile.*$gdb_prompt $" {
            pass $test
        }
     }