Fixes these testsuite fails on Windows:
FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_float_complex_values(fc1, fc2)
FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: p t_float_complex_many_args(fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4)
FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: noproto: p t_float_complex_values(fc1, fc2)
FAIL: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: noproto: p t_float_complex_many_args(fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: p/c fun(); call call-sc-tld
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: advance to fun for return; return call-sc-tld
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: zed L for return; return call-sc-tld
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: return foo; return call-sc-tld
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: return foo; synchronize pc to main() for 'call-sc-tld'
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: return foo; synchronize pc to main() for 'call-sc-tld'
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: advance to fun for finish; return call-sc-tld
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: zed L for finish; return call-sc-tld
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: finish foo; return call-sc-tld (the program is no longer running)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: value foo finished; return call-sc-tld
For function arguments (callfuncs.exp), only TYPE_CODE_COMPLEX was
missing in the types passed via integer registers.
For return values, there were a lot more issues:
- TYPE_CODE_DECFLOAT is NOT returned via XMM0.
- long double is NOT returned via XMM0.
- but __int128 IS returned via XMM0.
- the comments for TYPE_CODE_FLT state that __m128, __m128i and __m128d are
returned by XMM0, and this is correct, but it doesn't actually check for
them, because they are TYPE_CODE_ARRAY with TYPE_VECTOR
So I had to add TYPE_CODE_DECFLOAT to the arguments passed via XMM register,
but I had to remove it from the values returned via XMM0 register.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-10-05 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
* amd64-windows-tdep.c (amd64_windows_passed_by_integer_register):
Add TYPE_CODE_COMPLEX.
(amd64_windows_return_value): Fix types returned via XMM0.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-10-05 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
* gdb.base/call-sc.c: Fix return struct on stack test case.
* gdb.base/call-sc.exp: Likewise.
+2020-10-05 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
+
+ * amd64-windows-tdep.c (amd64_windows_passed_by_integer_register):
+ Add TYPE_CODE_COMPLEX.
+ (amd64_windows_return_value): Fix types returned via XMM0.
+
2020-10-05 Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
* MAINTAINERS (Responsible Maintainers): Add Luis Machado to
case TYPE_CODE_RVALUE_REF:
case TYPE_CODE_STRUCT:
case TYPE_CODE_UNION:
+ case TYPE_CODE_COMPLEX:
return (TYPE_LENGTH (type) == 1
|| TYPE_LENGTH (type) == 2
|| TYPE_LENGTH (type) == 4
switch (type->code ())
{
case TYPE_CODE_FLT:
- case TYPE_CODE_DECFLOAT:
- /* __m128, __m128i, __m128d, floats, and doubles are returned
- via XMM0. */
- if (len == 4 || len == 8 || len == 16)
+ /* floats, and doubles are returned via XMM0. */
+ if (len == 4 || len == 8)
regnum = AMD64_XMM0_REGNUM;
break;
+ case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
+ /* __m128, __m128i and __m128d are returned via XMM0. */
+ if (TYPE_VECTOR (type) && len == 16)
+ {
+ enum type_code code = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type)->code ();
+ if (code == TYPE_CODE_INT || code == TYPE_CODE_FLT)
+ {
+ regnum = AMD64_XMM0_REGNUM;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ /* fall through */
default:
/* All other values that are 1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes long are returned
via RAX. */
if (len == 1 || len == 2 || len == 4 || len == 8)
regnum = AMD64_RAX_REGNUM;
+ else if (len == 16 && type->code () == TYPE_CODE_INT)
+ regnum = AMD64_XMM0_REGNUM;
break;
}
+2020-10-05 Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
+
+ * gdb.base/call-sc.c: Fix return struct on stack test case.
+ * gdb.base/call-sc.exp: Likewise.
+
2020-10-02 Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
* README: Fix "paralell".
#endif
T foo = '1', L;
+T init = '9';
T fun()
{
{
int i;
- Fun(foo);
+ /* Use a different initial value then is later used in the
+ "value foo returned" test, so in case the struct is then returned
+ on the stack, it doesn't have the correct value by accident. */
+ Fun(init);
/* An infinite loop that first clears all the variables and then
calls the function. This "hack" is to make re-testing easier -
fail "${test}"
}
}
+ -re " = 57 .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
+ if $return_value_unknown {
+ # The struct return case.
+ # The return value is stored on the stack, and since GDB
+ # didn't override it, it still has value that was stored
+ # there in the earlier Foo(init) call.
+ pass "${test}"
+ } else {
+ # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
+ # the location of the return-value.
+ fail "${test}"
+ }
+ }
-re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
if $return_value_unimplemented {
# What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented