Issue description from Matt's commit
e7c376ad:
"var_range_end(v, n) loops over the n components of variable number v and
finds the maximum value, giving the last use of any component of v.
Therefore it expects v to correspond to the variable associated with the
.x channel of the VGRF.
var_from_reg() however returns the variable for the first channel of the
VGRF, post-swizzle.
So, if the last register had a swizzle with y, z, or w in the swizzle
component, we would read out of bounds. For any other register, we would
read liveness information from the next register.
The fix is to convert the src_reg to a dst_reg in order to call the
dst_reg version of var_from_reg() that doesn't consider the swizzle."
Closes: #3003
Fixes: 48dfb30f ('intel/compiler: Move all live interval analysis results into vec4_live_variables')
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Simiklit <asimiklit.work@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4941>
* more -- a sure sign they'll fail operands_match().
*/
if (src->file == VGRF) {
- if (live.var_range_end(var_from_reg(alloc, *src), 8) < ip) {
+ if (live.var_range_end(var_from_reg(alloc, dst_reg(*src)), 8) < ip) {
entry->remove();
ralloc_free(entry);
break;