I saw this complaint when my code had some bug, and spotted the typo.
Fix it, and while at it mention DW_MACRO as well (it would be confusing
to only see DW_MACINFO with a file that uses a DWARF 5 .debug_macro
section). I contemplated the idea of passing the knowledge of whether
we are dealing with a .debug_macro section or .debug_macinfo section, to
print only the right one. But in the end, I don't think that trouble is
necessary for a complaint nobody is going to see.
Change-Id: I276ce8da65c3eac5304f64a1e246358ed29cdbbc
if (opcode_definitions[opcode] == NULL)
{
- complaint (_("unrecognized DW_MACFINO opcode 0x%x"),
+ complaint (_("unrecognized DW_MACINFO or DW_MACRO opcode 0x%x"),
opcode);
return NULL;
}