The code mistakenly thinks any cond_jump has two successors. This is
not true if both destinations are the same, as can happen with weird
patterns as in the PR.
PR rtl-optimization/68182
* gcc/bb-reorder.c (reorder_basic_blocks_simple): Treat a conditional
branch with only one successor just like unconditional branches.
From-SVN: r229983
-2015-11-08 Jeff Law <jeff@redhat.com>
+2015-11-09 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
+
+ PR rtl-optimization/68182
+ * gcc/bb-reorder.c (reorder_basic_blocks_simple): Treat a conditional
+ branch with only one successor just like unconditional branches.
+
+2015-11-08 Jeff Law <jeff@redhat.com>
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (register_jump_thraed): Assert that a
non-FSM path has no edges marked with EDGE_DFS_BACK.
if (JUMP_P (end) && extract_asm_operands (end))
continue;
- if (any_condjump_p (end))
+ if (single_succ_p (bb))
+ edges[n++] = EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0);
+ else if (any_condjump_p (end))
{
edge e0 = EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0);
edge e1 = EDGE_SUCC (bb, 1);
edges[n++] = e0;
edges[n++] = e1;
}
- else if (single_succ_p (bb))
- edges[n++] = EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0);
}
/* Sort the edges, the most desirable first. When optimizing for size