+2004-02-02 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
+
+ * dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_cache): Deal with a return address
+ column that's "empty" or "same value" when eliminating REG_RA
+ rules.
+
2004-02-02 Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
* breakpoint.h (struct breakpoint): Add new flag, from_tty,
{
if (cache->reg[regnum].how == REG_RA)
{
- if (fs->retaddr_column < fs->regs.num_regs)
+ /* It seems rather bizarre to specify an "empty" column as
+ the return adress column. However, this is exactly
+ what GCC does on some targets. It turns out that GCC
+ assumes that the return address can be found in the
+ register corresponding to the return address column.
+ Incidentally, that's how should treat a return address
+ column specifying "same value" too. */
+ if (fs->retaddr_column < fs->regs.num_regs
+ && fs->regs.reg[fs->retaddr_column].how != REG_UNSPECIFIED
+ && fs->regs.reg[fs->retaddr_column].how != REG_SAME_VALUE)
cache->reg[regnum] = fs->regs.reg[fs->retaddr_column];
else
{
- /* It turns out that GCC assumes that if the return
- address column is "empty" the return address can be
- found in the register corresponding to the return
- address column. */
cache->reg[regnum].loc.reg = fs->retaddr_column;
cache->reg[regnum].how = REG_SAVED_REG;
}