benefit of EU Citizens (and incidentally the rest of the world).
I had a brief chat with the person from the EU Commission. He was
-delighted to be able to see the sheer number of people involved and being
-sponsored by NLNet. I had an opportunity to ask him about the anti-trust
-aspects of the RISC-V Foundation's ongoing intransigent behaviour.
-He initially expressed puzzlement and some concern, because the EU is
-funding quite a lot of RISC-V projects, and none of them had any issues.
-I asked him a very simple question: "how many of those projects are
-simply *implementing* existing RISC-V Standards?," and he replied, "all
-of them." I then asked, "how many of those projects are *innovating*,
+delighted to be able to see the sheer number of people involved and
+being sponsored by NLNet. I had an opportunity to express some of my
+concerns about NLNet's relationship with the RISC-V Foundation. He
+initially expressed puzzlement, because the EU is funding quite a lot
+of RISC-V projects, and none of them had any issues. I asked him a
+very simple question: "how many of those projects are simply
+*implementing* existing RISC-V Standards?," and he replied, "all of
+them." I then asked, "how many of those projects are *innovating*,
developing alternative extensions to what is dictated by the RISC-V
-Foundation?" With the answer being "none," *that* was the point at which
-he understood the extent of the problem. I'll publish a more comprehensive
-update on this topic soon.
+Foundation?" With the answer being "none," *that* was the point at
+which he understood the extent of the problem. I'll publish a more
+comprehensive update on this topic soon.
### Meeting Other LibreSOC People