+2020-01-09 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/65428
+ * array.c (empty_constructor): New variable.
+ (empty_ts): New variable.
+ (expand_constructor): Save typespec in empty_ts.
+ Unset empty_constructor if there is an element.
+ (gfc_expand_constructor): Initialize empty_constructor
+ and empty_ts. If there was no explicit constructor
+ type and the constructor is empty, take the type from
+ empty_ts.
+
2020-01-09 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/84135
return t;
}
+/* Variables for noticing if all constructors are empty, and
+ if any of them had a type. */
+
+static bool empty_constructor;
+static gfc_typespec empty_ts;
/* Expand a constructor into constant constructors without any
iterators, calling the work function for each of the expanded
e = c->expr;
+ if (empty_constructor)
+ empty_ts = e->ts;
+
if (e->expr_type == EXPR_ARRAY)
{
if (!expand_constructor (e->value.constructor))
continue;
}
+ empty_constructor = false;
e = gfc_copy_expr (e);
if (!gfc_simplify_expr (e, 1))
{
iter_stack = NULL;
+ empty_constructor = true;
+ gfc_clear_ts (&empty_ts);
current_expand.expand_work_function = expand;
if (!expand_constructor (e->value.constructor))
goto done;
}
+ /* If we don't have an explicit constructor type, and there
+ were only empty constructors, then take the type from
+ them. */
+
+ if (constructor_ts.type == BT_UNKNOWN && empty_constructor)
+ e->ts = empty_ts;
+
gfc_constructor_free (e->value.constructor);
e->value.constructor = current_expand.base;
+2020-01-09 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/65428
+ * gfortran.dg/zero_sized_11.f90: New test.
+ * gfortran.dg/zero_sized_12.f90: New test.
+
2020-01-09 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
* g++.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general-c++/mul_lane_1.c: New test.
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR 65428 - this used to ICE. Original test case by FX Coudert.
+program p
+ integer :: i
+ print *, [shape(1)]
+ print *, [[ integer :: ]]
+ print *, (/ (/ (i, i=1,0) /) /)
+end
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR 65248 - this used to ICE. Test case by Tobias Burnus.
+
+program main
+
+! C7110 (R770) If type-spec is omitted, each ac-value expression in the
+! array-constructor shall have the same declared type and kind type parameters
+
+! Should be fine as there is either no or only one ac-value:
+print *, [[integer ::],[real::]]
+print *, [[integer ::],[real::], [1], [real ::]]
+print *, [[integer ::],[real::], ["ABC"], [real ::]] // "ABC"
+print *, [integer :: [integer ::],[real::]]
+
+! OK - accepted
+print *, [integer :: [1],[1.0]]
+end