In implementing Jason's suggested direction for 93933, the compiler
exploded in a surprising way. Turns out an assert had been passing
NULLS to comptypes, and therefore not checking what it intended.
Further comptypes, could silently accept such nulls under most
circumstances.
* class.c (adjust_clone_args): Correct arg-checking assert.
* typeck.c (comptypes): Assert not nulls.
+2020-02-27 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
+
+ * class.c (adjust_clone_args): Correct arg-checking assert.
+ * typeck.c (comptypes): Assert not nulls.
+
2020-02-26 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/93789 - ICE with invalid array bounds.
break;
}
- gcc_assert (same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (decl_parms),
- TREE_TYPE (clone_parms)));
+ gcc_checking_assert (same_type_p (TREE_VALUE (decl_parms),
+ TREE_VALUE (clone_parms)));
if (TREE_PURPOSE (decl_parms) && !TREE_PURPOSE (clone_parms))
{
bool
comptypes (tree t1, tree t2, int strict)
{
+ gcc_checking_assert (t1 && t2);
+
if (strict == COMPARE_STRICT && comparing_specializations
&& (t1 != TYPE_CANONICAL (t1) || t2 != TYPE_CANONICAL (t2)))
/* If comparing_specializations, treat dependent aliases as distinct. */
strict = COMPARE_STRUCTURAL;
+
if (strict == COMPARE_STRICT)
{
if (t1 == t2)