* remote.c (extended_remote_mourn_1): Invalidate our notion of

	current general thread.

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index caff8a8ee54805e801b8eda0f3055e6cd5f3ddca..c9c46166928ee1953b7fefc09e9947c7832179f3 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2009-01-14  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>
+
+       * remote.c (extended_remote_mourn_1): Invalidate our notion of
+       current general thread.
+
 2009-01-14  Pedro Alves  <pedro@codesourcery.com>
 
        * mi/mi-main.c (mi_cmd_execute): Also allow -list-thread-groups

diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index 92d00c29034d56cd7bc513c1c9669fd1ec62e4d3..4864dde3845c68ab6f5ebf5566983c6d97be573d 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -6548,6 +6548,31 @@ extended_remote_mourn_1 (struct target_ops *target)
   /* We're no longer interested in these events.  */
   discard_pending_stop_replies (ptid_get_pid (inferior_ptid));
 
+  /* If the current general thread belonged to the process we just
+     detached from or has exited, the remote side current general
+     thread becomes undefined.  Considering a case like this:
+
+     - We just got here due to a detach.
+     - The process that we're detaching from happens to immediately
+       report a global breakpoint being hit in non-stop mode, in the
+       same thread we had selected before.
+     - GDB attaches to this process again.
+     - This event happens to be the next event we handle.
+
+     GDB would consider that the current general thread didn't need to
+     be set on the stub side (with Hg), since for all it knew,
+     GENERAL_THREAD hadn't changed.
+
+     Notice that although in all-stop mode, the remote server always
+     sets the current thread to the thread reporting the stop event,
+     that doesn't happen in non-stop mode; in non-stop, the stub *must
+     not* change the current thread when reporting a breakpoint hit,
+     due to the decoupling of event reporting and event handling.
+
+     To keep things simple, we always invalidate our notion of the
+     current thread.  */
+  record_currthread (minus_one_ptid);
+
   /* Unlike "target remote", we do not want to unpush the target; then
      the next time the user says "run", we won't be connected.  */