From what we understand, individuals with no affiliation (to a Company or Academic Institution) would be prevented from tabling arbitrary ISA extensions (without a sponsor, that is). Given that the OPF ISA WG has to act entirely fairly i.e. in a non-discriminatory fashion towards all proposals, yet also take into account the huge burden of time and responsibility that results in perpetuity from any such inclusion, it is a reasonable balance.
-Yet at the same time, whilst being perfectly reasonable, we feel that our unique circumstances hsve not been anticipated. We would therefore welcome some constructive feedback as to how we would go about submitting our work, and also how we can communicate effectively that we are in this for the long haul, and are committed to seeing it through.
+Yet at the same time, whilst being perfectly reasonable, we feel that our unique circumstances have not been anticipated. We would therefore welcome some constructive feedback as to how we would go about submitting our work, and also how we can communicate effectively that we are in this for the long haul, and are committed to seeing it through.
Note: the work that LibreSOC is doing is definitively intended for the long term. Thanks to NLnet's "Works for the Public Good" remit, even if, by some mischance, LibreSOC was to evaporate the work that we are doing would still be available since what we do is entirely libre.