being that product in extremely large volume gets discarded into landfill.
All and any of the issues that were discussed, and all of those that
-were not, can be avoided by providing a forwards and backwards
-compatible transition path between the current and future *mandatory*
-parts of revisions of the RISC-V ISA Standard.
+were not, can be avoided by providing a hardware-level runtime-enabled
+forwards and backwards compatible transition path between *all* parts
+(mandatory or not) of current and future revisions of the RISC-V ISA
+Standard.
The rest of the discussion - indicative as it was of the stark mutually
exclusive gap being faced by the RISC-V ISA Standard given that it does