+Sat Jan 22 17:08:48 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
+
+ * i386aix-nat.c (i386_float_info): Reverse order of registers before
+ passing them to print_387_status.
+ (print_387_status): Don't subtract top from 7 before using it.
+ * i387-tdep.c: Remove comment about AIX wanting "top" subtracted
+ from 7; the above explains it.
+
Sat Jan 22 20:25:11 1994 Peter Schauer (pes@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de)
* mips-tdep.c (init_extra_frame_info): Use frame relative stack
printf_unfiltered ("%s; ", local_hex_string(ep->eip));
printf_unfiltered ("operand %s", local_hex_string(ep->operand_seg));
printf_unfiltered (":%s\n", local_hex_string(ep->operand));
-
- top = 7- ((ep->status >> 11) & 7);
-
+
+ top = ((ep->status >> 11) & 7);
+
printf_unfiltered ("regno tag msb lsb value\n");
for (fpreg = 7; fpreg >= 0; fpreg--)
{
double val;
-
+
printf_unfiltered ("%s %d: ", fpreg == top ? "=>" : " ", fpreg);
-
+
switch ((ep->tag >> ((7 - fpreg) * 2)) & 3)
{
case 0: printf_unfiltered ("valid "); break;
{
struct env387 fps;
int fpsaved = 0;
+ /* We need to reverse the order of the registers. Apparently AIX stores
+ the highest-numbered ones first. */
+ struct env387 fps_fixed;
+ int i;
if (inferior_pid)
{
MIN(10, sizeof(fps) - offset));
}
}
-
- print_387_status (0, (struct env387 *)&fps);
+ fps_fixed = fps;
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
+ memcpy (fps_fixed.regs[i], fps.regs[7 - i], 10);
+ print_387_status (0, &fps_fixed);
}
/* Fetch one register. */
(status & 0x0200) != 0,
(status & 0x0100) != 0);
- /* FIXME: Someone claims this should be 7 - (status >> 11) & 7 for AIX.
- What's the story? Is the following just wrong or are differing
- notations in use? */
printf_unfiltered ("top %d\n", (status >> 11) & 7);
}