cpu: fix comment in bpf.cpu

2019-11-20  Jose E. Marchesi  <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>

	* bpf.cpu: Fix comment describing the 128-bit instruction format.

diff --git a/cpu/ChangeLog b/cpu/ChangeLog
index 375cb199669a5ee8d8ce7c51ff5007a9a0a93380..87cec69e4f7c608b58dabe2a6ebe79c7b88a0378 100644 (file)
--- a/cpu/ChangeLog
+++ b/cpu/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2019-11-20  Jose E. Marchesi  <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
+
+       * bpf.cpu: Fix comment describing the 128-bit instruction format.
+
 2019-09-09  Phil Blundell  <pb@pbcl.net>
 
        binutils 2.33 branch created.

diff --git a/cpu/bpf.cpu b/cpu/bpf.cpu
index aa01fbbb2eaad0504a50fcc6d48831a4e72444b3..db2301c4952bcf429d3e7f61fc3d0eba30da93e9 100644 (file)
--- a/cpu/bpf.cpu
+++ b/cpu/bpf.cpu
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 ;; Whereas the 128-bit instructions (at the moment there is only one
 ;; of such instructions, lddw) have the form:
 ;;
-;;      code:8 regs:8 offset:16 imm:32 imm:32 unused:32
+;;      code:8 regs:8 offset:16 imm:32 unused:32 imm:32 
 ;;
 ;; In both formats `regs' is itself composed by two fields:
 ;;