Rely on BFD_BIG_ENDIAN and BFD_LITTLE_ENDIAN instead of host dependant
BIG_ENDIAN and LITTLE_ENDIAN.
+--
+
+printcmd.c (print_address_numeric):
+
+NOTE: This assumes that the significant address information is kept in
+the least significant bits of ADDR - the upper bits were either zero
+or sign extended. Should ADDRESS_TO_POINTER() or some
+ADDRESS_TO_PRINTABLE() be used to do the conversion?
+
--
Code Cleanups: General
/* Print values for GNU debugger GDB.
- Copyright 1986-1991, 1993-1995, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ Copyright 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994, 1995,
+ 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of GDB.
case 'a':
{
- /* Truncate address to the size of a target pointer, avoiding
- shifts larger or equal than the width of a CORE_ADDR. The
- local variable PTR_BIT stops the compiler reporting a shift
- overflow when it won't occure. */
CORE_ADDR addr = unpack_pointer (type, valaddr);
- int ptr_bit = TARGET_PTR_BIT;
- if (ptr_bit < (sizeof (CORE_ADDR) * HOST_CHAR_BIT))
- addr &= ((CORE_ADDR) 1 << ptr_bit) - 1;
print_address (addr, stream);
}
break;
int use_local;
struct ui_file *stream;
{
- /* This assumes a CORE_ADDR can fit in a LONGEST. Probably a safe
- assumption. */
+ /* Truncate address to the size of a target pointer, avoiding shifts
+ larger or equal than the width of a CORE_ADDR. The local
+ variable PTR_BIT stops the compiler reporting a shift overflow
+ when it won't occure. */
+ /* NOTE: This assumes that the significant address information is
+ kept in the least significant bits of ADDR - the upper bits were
+ either zero or sign extended. Should ADDRESS_TO_POINTER() or
+ some ADDRESS_TO_PRINTABLE() be used to do the conversion? */
+ int ptr_bit = TARGET_PTR_BIT;
+ if (ptr_bit < (sizeof (CORE_ADDR) * HOST_CHAR_BIT))
+ addr &= ((CORE_ADDR) 1 << ptr_bit) - 1;
print_longest (stream, 'x', use_local, (ULONGEST) addr);
}