PR 15231: import bare DW_TAG_lexical_block
authorJan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Mon, 30 May 2016 12:14:43 +0000 (14:14 +0200)
committerJan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Mon, 30 May 2016 12:14:43 +0000 (14:14 +0200)
Local variables in lambdas are not accessible
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15231

GDB: read_lexical_block_scope
  /* Ignore blocks with missing or invalid low and high pc attributes.  */
[...]
  if (!dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (die, &lowpc, &highpc, cu, NULL))
    return;

But sometimes there is:

FAIL: gcc-5.3.1-6.fc23.x86_64
 <2><92>: Abbrev Number: 11 (DW_TAG_lexical_block)
 <3><9c>: Abbrev Number: 13 (DW_TAG_structure_type)
    <9d>   DW_AT_name        : (indirect string, offset: 0x3c): <lambda()>
    [...]

Where DW_TAG_lexical_block has no attributes.  Such whole subtree is currently
dropped by GDB while I think it should just import all its children DIEs.

It even XFAIL->XPASSes gdb.ada/out_of_line_in_inlined.exp:
commit 0fa7fe506c242b459c4c05d331e7c7d66fb52390
Author: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
    out of line functions nested inside inline functions.
So I have removed that xfail.

gdb/ChangeLog
2016-05-30  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

PR c++/15231
* dwarf2read.c (enum pc_bounds_kind): Add PC_BOUNDS_INVALID.
(process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader, read_func_scope): Adjust callers.
(read_lexical_block_scope): Import DIEs from bare DW_TAG_lexical_block.
(read_call_site_scope): Adjust callers.
(dwarf2_get_pc_bounds): Implement pc_bounds_invalid.
(dwarf2_get_subprogram_pc_bounds, get_scope_pc_bounds): Adjust callers.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-05-30  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

PR c++/15231
* gdb.ada/out_of_line_in_inlined.exp: Remove xfails.
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lexical-block-bare.exp: New file.

gdb/ChangeLog
gdb/dwarf2read.c
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/out_of_line_in_inlined.exp
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lexical-block-bare.exp [new file with mode: 0644]

index de202573b52f40e5fdcb3b5ce30afbe76392feae..04c168612a561e373da5191732adce30ea4c756d 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2016-05-30  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+       PR c++/15231
+       * dwarf2read.c (enum pc_bounds_kind): Add PC_BOUNDS_INVALID.
+       (process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader, read_func_scope): Adjust callers.
+       (read_lexical_block_scope): Import DIEs from bare DW_TAG_lexical_block.
+       (read_call_site_scope): Adjust callers.
+       (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds): Implement pc_bounds_invalid.
+       (dwarf2_get_subprogram_pc_bounds, get_scope_pc_bounds): Adjust callers.
+
 2016-05-30  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
 
        Code cleanup: dwarf2_get_pc_bounds: -1/0/+1 -> enum
index f90db00e2c157682d8c7b1f446c525ccd6f2c186..6658a386ec9a20851308d14545f1077714668ffa 100644 (file)
@@ -1607,13 +1607,16 @@ static int dwarf2_ranges_read (unsigned, CORE_ADDR *, CORE_ADDR *,
                               struct dwarf2_cu *, struct partial_symtab *);
 
 /* How dwarf2_get_pc_bounds constructed its *LOWPC and *HIGHPC return
-   values.  */
+   values.  Keep the items ordered with increasing constraints compliance.  */
 enum pc_bounds_kind
 {
-  /* No valid combination of DW_AT_low_pc, DW_AT_high_pc or DW_AT_ranges
-     was found.  */
+  /* No attribute DW_AT_low_pc, DW_AT_high_pc or DW_AT_ranges was found.  */
   PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT,
 
+  /* Some of the attributes DW_AT_low_pc, DW_AT_high_pc or DW_AT_ranges
+     were present but they do not form a valid range of PC addresses.  */
+  PC_BOUNDS_INVALID,
+
   /* Discontiguous range was found - that is DW_AT_ranges was found.  */
   PC_BOUNDS_RANGES,
 
@@ -6019,7 +6022,7 @@ process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
       first_die = load_partial_dies (reader, info_ptr, 1);
 
       scan_partial_symbols (first_die, &lowpc, &highpc,
-                           cu_bounds_kind == PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT, cu);
+                           cu_bounds_kind <= PC_BOUNDS_INVALID, cu);
 
       /* If we didn't find a lowpc, set it to highpc to avoid
         complaints from `maint check'.  */
@@ -6028,7 +6031,7 @@ process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
 
       /* If the compilation unit didn't have an explicit address range,
         then use the information extracted from its child dies.  */
-      if (cu_bounds_kind == PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT)
+      if (cu_bounds_kind <= PC_BOUNDS_INVALID)
        {
          best_lowpc = lowpc;
          best_highpc = highpc;
@@ -11390,7 +11393,7 @@ read_func_scope (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
 
   /* Ignore functions with missing or invalid low and high pc attributes.  */
   if (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (die, &lowpc, &highpc, cu, NULL)
-      == PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT)
+      <= PC_BOUNDS_INVALID)
     {
       attr = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_external, cu);
       if (!attr || !DW_UNSND (attr))
@@ -11552,9 +11555,20 @@ read_lexical_block_scope (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
      as multiple lexical blocks?  Handling children in a sane way would
      be nasty.  Might be easier to properly extend generic blocks to
      describe ranges.  */
-  if (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (die, &lowpc, &highpc, cu, NULL)
-      == PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT)
-    return;
+  switch (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (die, &lowpc, &highpc, cu, NULL))
+    {
+    case PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT:
+      /* DW_TAG_lexical_block has no attributes, process its children as if
+        there was no wrapping by that DW_TAG_lexical_block.
+        GCC does no longer produces such DWARF since GCC r224161.  */
+      for (child_die = die->child;
+          child_die != NULL && child_die->tag;
+          child_die = sibling_die (child_die))
+       process_die (child_die, cu);
+      return;
+    case PC_BOUNDS_INVALID:
+      return;
+    }
   lowpc = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, lowpc + baseaddr);
   highpc = gdbarch_adjust_dwarf2_addr (gdbarch, highpc + baseaddr);
 
@@ -11764,7 +11778,7 @@ read_call_site_scope (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
 
          /* DW_AT_entry_pc should be preferred.  */
          if (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (target_die, &lowpc, NULL, target_cu, NULL)
-             == PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT)
+             <= PC_BOUNDS_INVALID)
            complaint (&symfile_complaints,
                       _("DW_AT_GNU_call_site_target target DIE has invalid "
                         "low pc, for referencing DIE 0x%x [in module %s]"),
@@ -12041,7 +12055,7 @@ dwarf2_ranges_read (unsigned offset, CORE_ADDR *low_return,
 
 /* Get low and high pc attributes from a die.  See enum pc_bounds_kind
    definition for the return value.  *LOWPC and *HIGHPC are set iff
-   PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT is not returned.  */
+   neither PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT nor PC_BOUNDS_INVALID are returned.  */
 
 static enum pc_bounds_kind
 dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (struct die_info *die, CORE_ADDR *lowpc,
@@ -12052,7 +12066,7 @@ dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (struct die_info *die, CORE_ADDR *lowpc,
   struct attribute *attr_high;
   CORE_ADDR low = 0;
   CORE_ADDR high = 0;
-  enum pc_bounds_kind ret = PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT;
+  enum pc_bounds_kind ret;
 
   attr_high = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_high_pc, cu);
   if (attr_high)
@@ -12067,7 +12081,7 @@ dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (struct die_info *die, CORE_ADDR *lowpc,
        }
       else
        /* Found high w/o low attribute.  */
-       return PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT;
+       return PC_BOUNDS_INVALID;
 
       /* Found consecutive range of addresses.  */
       ret = PC_BOUNDS_HIGH_LOW;
@@ -12089,15 +12103,17 @@ dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (struct die_info *die, CORE_ADDR *lowpc,
          /* Value of the DW_AT_ranges attribute is the offset in the
             .debug_ranges section.  */
          if (!dwarf2_ranges_read (ranges_offset, &low, &high, cu, pst))
-           return PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT;
+           return PC_BOUNDS_INVALID;
          /* Found discontinuous range of addresses.  */
          ret = PC_BOUNDS_RANGES;
        }
+      else
+       return PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT;
     }
 
   /* read_partial_die has also the strict LOW < HIGH requirement.  */
   if (high <= low)
-    return PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT;
+    return PC_BOUNDS_INVALID;
 
   /* When using the GNU linker, .gnu.linkonce. sections are used to
      eliminate duplicate copies of functions and vtables and such.
@@ -12108,7 +12124,7 @@ dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (struct die_info *die, CORE_ADDR *lowpc,
      If this is a discarded function, mark the pc bounds as invalid,
      so that GDB will ignore it.  */
   if (low == 0 && !dwarf2_per_objfile->has_section_at_zero)
-    return PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT;
+    return PC_BOUNDS_INVALID;
 
   *lowpc = low;
   if (highpc)
@@ -12129,8 +12145,7 @@ dwarf2_get_subprogram_pc_bounds (struct die_info *die,
   CORE_ADDR low, high;
   struct die_info *child = die->child;
 
-  if (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (die, &low, &high, cu, NULL)
-      != PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT)
+  if (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (die, &low, &high, cu, NULL) >= PC_BOUNDS_RANGES)
     {
       *lowpc = min (*lowpc, low);
       *highpc = max (*highpc, high);
@@ -12168,7 +12183,7 @@ get_scope_pc_bounds (struct die_info *die,
   CORE_ADDR current_low, current_high;
 
   if (dwarf2_get_pc_bounds (die, &current_low, &current_high, cu, NULL)
-      != PC_BOUNDS_NOT_PRESENT)
+      >= PC_BOUNDS_RANGES)
     {
       best_low = current_low;
       best_high = current_high;
index 4819203a103ae1d35b9205bb30a6001f90785f10..8397f671a1e147f45aaf03d81d6366771eb43758 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2016-05-30  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+       PR c++/15231
+       * gdb.ada/out_of_line_in_inlined.exp: Remove xfails.
+       * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lexical-block-bare.exp: New file.
+
 2016-05-27  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
 
        * gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp (bad_dejagnu):
index 1ebd89f5d71e342c86c1f1c1e8431d3517319d91..8a3a4b170e981db8b66a69de20e8e169af750340 100644 (file)
@@ -23,20 +23,14 @@ if {[gdb_compile_ada "${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug optimize=-O2}]
 
 clean_restart ${testfile}
 
-# GCC currently is missing a DW_AT_origin attribute in one of the
-# lexical blocks, preventing GDB from creating a symbol for the
-# subprogram we want to break on.
-setup_xfail "*-*-*"
 gdb_test "break foo_o224_021.child1.child2" \
          "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at.*: file .*foo_o224_021.adb, line \[0-9\]+."
 
 gdb_run_cmd
-setup_xfail "*-*-*"
 gdb_test "" \
          "Breakpoint $decimal, foo_o224_021\\.child1\\.child2 \\(s=\\.\\.\\.\\).*"
 
 set opt_addr_in "($hex in)?"
-setup_xfail "*-*-*"
 gdb_test "bt" \
     [multi_line "#0 +$opt_addr_in +foo_o224_021\\.child1\\.child2 \\(s=\\.\\.\\.\\).*" \
                 "#1 +$opt_addr_in +foo_o224_021\\.child1 \\(\\).*" \
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lexical-block-bare.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-lexical-block-bare.exp
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..3f9411e
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# Copyright 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+load_lib dwarf.exp
+
+# This test can only be run on targets which support DWARF-2 and use gas.
+if {![dwarf2_support]} {
+    return 0
+}
+
+standard_testfile .S main.c
+
+# Make some DWARF for the test.
+set asm_file [standard_output_file $srcfile]
+Dwarf::assemble $asm_file {
+    cu {} {
+       compile_unit {
+           {low_pc [gdb_target_symbol main] DW_FORM_addr}
+           {high_pc [gdb_target_symbol main]+0x10000 DW_FORM_addr}
+       } {
+           declare_labels integer_label
+
+           integer_label: DW_TAG_base_type {
+               {DW_AT_byte_size 4 DW_FORM_sdata}
+               {DW_AT_encoding  @DW_ATE_signed}
+               {DW_AT_name      integer}
+           }
+
+           DW_TAG_subprogram {
+               {name main}
+               {DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+               {low_pc [gdb_target_symbol main] DW_FORM_addr}
+               {high_pc [gdb_target_symbol main]+0x10000 DW_FORM_addr}
+           } {
+               DW_TAG_lexical_block {
+               } {
+                   DW_TAG_variable {
+                       {DW_AT_name testvar}
+                           {DW_AT_type :$integer_label}
+                           {DW_AT_external 1 flag}
+                       {DW_AT_location {
+                           DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol main]
+                       } SPECIAL_expr}
+                   }
+               }
+           }
+       }
+    }
+}
+
+if { [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} \
+                         [list $srcfile2 $asm_file] {nodebug}] } {
+    return -1
+}
+
+runto_main
+
+# FAILing GDB did print: No symbol "testvar" in current context.
+gdb_test "p testvar" { = -?[0-9]+}