Hi,
I see this error when GDB connects with qemu,
(gdb) n
....
Sending packet: $vCont;c#a8...Ack
Packet received: Ffstat,
00000001,
f6fff038
Cannot execute this command while the target is running.
Use the "interrupt" command to stop the target
and then try again.
looks we don't set rs->waiting_for_stop_reply to zero
before handle fileio request,
#10 0x00000000005edb64 in target_write (len=64, offset=
4143968312, buf=0x7fffffffd570 "\375\377\377\377", annex=0x0, object=TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY,
ops=<optimised out>) at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/target.c:1922
#11 target_write_memory (memaddr=memaddr@entry=
4143968312, myaddr=myaddr@entry=0x7fffffffd6a0 "", len=len@entry=64)
at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/target.c:1500
#12 0x00000000004b2b41 in remote_fileio_func_fstat (buf=0x127b258 "") at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/remote-fileio.c:1037
#13 0x00000000004b1878 in do_remote_fileio_request (uiout=<optimised out>, buf_arg=buf_arg@entry=0x127b240)
at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/remote-fileio.c:1204
#14 0x00000000005b8c7c in catch_exceptions_with_msg (func_uiout=<optimised out>, func=func@entry=0x4b1800 <do_remote_fileio_request>,
func_args=func_args@entry=0x127b240, gdberrmsg=gdberrmsg@entry=0x0, mask=mask@entry=RETURN_MASK_ALL)
at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/exceptions.c:187
#15 0x00000000005b8dea in catch_exceptions (uiout=<optimised out>, func=func@entry=0x4b1800 <do_remote_fileio_request>, func_args=func_args@entry=0x127b240,
mask=mask@entry=RETURN_MASK_ALL) at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/exceptions.c:167
#16 0x00000000004b2fff in remote_fileio_request (buf=0x127b240 "Xf6fff038,0:", ctrlc_pending_p=0) at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/remote-fileio.c:1255
#17 0x0000000000496f12 in remote_wait_as (ptid=..., status=0x7fffffffdb20, options=1) at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/remote.c:6997
however, we did set rs->waiting_for_stop_reply to zero before Luis's
patch https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-10/msg00336.html
In fact, Luis's patch v1
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-08/msg00809.html is about
setting rs->waiting_for_stop_reply back to one after
remote_fileio_request, which is correct. However during the review, the
patch is changed and ends up with "not setting rs->waiting_for_stop_reply
to zero".
I manually test GDB, but I don't have a way to run regression tests.
gdb:
2016-02-04 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* remote.c (remote_wait_as): Set rs->waiting_for_stop_reply to
0 before handling 'F' and set it back afterwards.
+2016-02-04 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
+
+ * remote.c (remote_wait_as): Set rs->waiting_for_stop_reply to
+ 0 before handling 'F' and set it back afterwards.
+
2016-02-02 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
* ui-out.c (MAX_UI_OUT_LEVELS): Remove.
status->value.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
break;
case 'F': /* File-I/O request. */
+ /* GDB may access the inferior memory while handling the File-I/O
+ request, but we don't want GDB accessing memory while waiting
+ for a stop reply. See the comments in putpkt_binary. Set
+ waiting_for_stop_reply to 0 temporarily. */
+ rs->waiting_for_stop_reply = 0;
remote_fileio_request (buf, rs->ctrlc_pending_p);
rs->ctrlc_pending_p = 0;
+ /* GDB handled the File-I/O request, and the target is running
+ again. Keep waiting for events. */
+ rs->waiting_for_stop_reply = 1;
break;
case 'N': case 'T': case 'S': case 'X': case 'W':
{