(no commit message)

diff --git a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
index bd7a6628f2a527f49bedc47c96b722f341bd4788..837748b25ecfae74ee308fbcbe8bc5c4d0d526cc 100644 (file)
--- a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
+++ b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ As you know the LibreSOC team have been working for over 3 years on a massive co
 
 https://www.sigarch.org/simd-instructions-considered-harmful/
 
-Normally, such huge ISA development efforts would be instigated, organised and funded through either Academia or an extremely large Corporation, or a Consortium combining multiple such entities.  It is therefore without precedent across the Computing Industry for something of this magnitude of effort to come not only from a Libre background but from a Libre background that is funded by a Charitable Foundation with a mandate to fund "Works for the Public Good".
+Normally, such huge ISA development efforts would be instigated, organised and funded through either Academia or an extremely large Corporation, or a Consortium combining multiple such entities.  It is therefore without precedent across the Computing Industry for something of this magnitude of effort to come not only from *individuals* with a completely independent non-affiliated Libre background but from a Libre background that is funded by a Charitable Foundation with a mandate to only fund "Works for the Public Good" (NLnet).
 
 From reading the PowerISA v3.0C sections we have learned and taken on board that a "Sandbox" opcode exists (EXT22) which is intended for "small private extensions" to the OpenPOWER ISA.  Our Bitmanipulation Extension alone, needed for Audio/Video and cryptographic workloads, struggles to fit into that space, and we have not yet added Custom 3D opcodes or the IEEE754 Transcendentals (SIN, COS).