To make amends for the recent (temporary) testsuite failure
of my new gcc.target/i386/minmax-9.c when compiled with -m32,
this patch improves the -m32 code we generate for the examples
in that test case.
The trick is to expand smin(x,0) as "x < 0 ? x : 0" instead
of the current "x <= 0 ? x : 0", as the former can take
advantage of sign_bit_mask operations.
2020-08-10 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
* config/i386/i386-expand.c (ix86_expand_int_movcc): Expand
signed MIN_EXPR against zero as "x < 0 ? x : 0" instead of
"x <= 0 ? x : 0" to enable sign_bit_compare_p optimizations.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* gcc.target/i386/minmax-12.c: New test.
{
var = operands[2];
if (INTVAL (operands[3]) == 0 && operands[2] != constm1_rtx)
- operands[2] = constm1_rtx, op = and_optab;
+ {
+ /* For smin (x, 0), expand as "x < 0 ? x : 0" instead of
+ "x <= 0 ? x : 0" to enable sign_bit_compare_p. */
+ if (code == LE && op1 == const0_rtx && rtx_equal_p (op0, var))
+ operands[1] = simplify_gen_relational (LT, VOIDmode,
+ GET_MODE (op0),
+ op0, const0_rtx);
+
+ operands[2] = constm1_rtx;
+ op = and_optab;
+ }
else if (INTVAL (operands[3]) == -1 && operands[3] != const0_rtx)
operands[2] = const0_rtx, op = ior_optab;
else
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -march=i386 -mtune=generic" } */
+
+#define min(a,b) (((a) < (b))? (a) : (b))
+
+int foo(int x)
+{
+ return min(x,0);
+}
+
+signed char bar(signed char x)
+{
+ return min(x,0);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "cltd" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "sarb" } } */