This is another vect case which requires special handling with
vect_hw_misalign. The alignment of the second part requires
misaligned vector access supports. This patch is to adjust
the related guard condition and comments.
Verified it on ppc64-redhat-linux (Power7 BE).
2020-04-09 Kewen Lin <linkw@gcc.gnu.org>
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR testsuite/94023
* gfortran.dg/vect/pr83232.f90: Expect 2 rather than 3 times SLP on
non-vect_hw_misalign targets.
+2020-04-09 Kewen Lin <linkw@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR testsuite/94023
+ * gfortran.dg/vect/pr83232.f90: Expect 2 rather than 3 times SLP on
+ non-vect_hw_misalign targets.
+
2020-04-08 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/94526
call foo (Einc)
END SUBROUTINE
-! We should vectorize (1), (2) and (3)
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 3 "slp1" } }
+! We should vectorize (1), (2) and (3) under vect_hw_misalign.
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 3 "slp1" { target vect_hw_misalign } } }
+! But only (1) and (3) under !vect_hw_misalign due to the alignment of (2).
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "slp1" { target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } }