* xcoffread.c (read_xcoff_symtab): Fix comment for yesterday's change.
authorJim Kingdon <jkingdon@engr.sgi.com>
Thu, 29 Sep 1994 15:26:16 +0000 (15:26 +0000)
committerJim Kingdon <jkingdon@engr.sgi.com>
Thu, 29 Sep 1994 15:26:16 +0000 (15:26 +0000)
gdb/ChangeLog
gdb/xcoffread.c

index 94eaa7352b9adfed72c2a1fc5a70735b4119b05a..b309561ba615100d3ab04d4882ec03f109075165 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Thu Sep 29 08:22:27 1994  Jim Kingdon  (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
+
+       * xcoffread.c (read_xcoff_symtab): Fix comment for yesterday's change.
+
 Wed Sep 28 17:48:18 1994  Jim Kingdon  (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
 
        * coffread.c (complete_symtab): If last_source_file is set upon
index 70f501dc2988c8513ad1f00132fd9ffa24e3ae13..5605131fdc56d7da349db07e3afbc102158c94f2 100644 (file)
@@ -1405,13 +1405,12 @@ read_xcoff_symtab (objfile, nsyms)
            continue;
 
          default:
-           /* xlc and old versions of gcc put each variable in a
-              separate csect, so we get an XTY_SD.  But new (2.5?
-              2.6? something like that) gcc's put several variables
-              in a csect, so that each variable only gets an XTY_LD.
-              We still need to record them.  This will typically be
-              XMC_RW; I suspect XMC_RO and XMC_BS might be possible
-              too.  */
+           /* xlc puts each variable in a separate csect, so we get
+              an XTY_SD for each variable.  But gcc puts several
+              variables in a csect, so that each variable only gets
+              an XTY_LD.  We still need to record them.  This will
+              typically be XMC_RW; I suspect XMC_RO and XMC_BS might
+              be possible too.  */
            break;
          }