(no commit message)

diff --git a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
index 11762444aae252286c29d7ab569d6827f35c5edf..f91dabce0f33a5e1d153291df6337cc0d23847d7 100644 (file)
--- a/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
+++ b/openpower/ISA_WG/Board_letter_26mar2021.mdwn
@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ Therefore whilst we in LibreSOC as individuals are the actual non-affiliated arc
 
 The key person acting as the bridge between both world will be myself (Luke Leighton), and I will ensure *and require* that RED Semiconductor provides adequate funds and resources for the long haul, in order to not only see through the proposals but also ensure that the associated toolchains, test suites, documentation etc. are properly written and maintained, long-term.  Yet I stress, again, that despite committing the financial resources,  RED Semiconductor will *not* own the Copyright or any patents on LibreSOC work.
 
+Our goal here is the ongoing long-term evolution of OpenPOWER, meeting
+the needs of an entirely new market of end-users currently not served by
+OpenPOWER, and still maintaining the long-term stability and reputation
+of the OpenPOWER ecosystem.
+ 
 My question to you is, therefore: what is the best way forward, here?  What "vehicle" or arrangement would be suitable that takes into account these unique circumstances? Would a conference call perhaps be a good idea to discuss?
 
 Respectfully,