+2004-05-18 Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
+
+ * hppa-tdep.c (hppa_frame_cache): If a frame pointer is available, use
+ it for unwinding the stack.
+
2004-05-18 Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
* config/pa/tm-linux.h (IN_SOLIB_CALL_TRAMPOLINE, SKIP_TRAMPOLINE_CODE)
the current function (and is thus equivalent to the "saved"
stack pointer. */
CORE_ADDR this_sp = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, HPPA_SP_REGNUM);
+ CORE_ADDR fp;
if (hppa_debug)
fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " (this_sp=0x%s, pc=0x%s, "
paddr_nz (frame_pc_unwind (next_frame)),
paddr_nz (prologue_end));
- if (frame_pc_unwind (next_frame) >= prologue_end)
+ /* Check to see if a frame pointer is available, and use it for
+ frame unwinding if it is.
+
+ There are some situations where we need to rely on the frame
+ pointer to do stack unwinding. For example, if a function calls
+ alloca (), the stack pointer can get adjusted inside the body of
+ the function. In this case, the ABI requires that the compiler
+ maintain a frame pointer for the function.
+
+ The unwind record has a flag (alloca_frame) that indicates that
+ a function has a variable frame; unfortunately, gcc/binutils
+ does not set this flag. Instead, whenever a frame pointer is used
+ and saved on the stack, the Save_SP flag is set. We use this to
+ decide whether to use the frame pointer for unwinding.
+
+ fp should never be zero here; checking just in case.
+
+ TODO: For the HP compiler, maybe we should use the alloca_frame flag
+ instead of Save_SP. */
+
+ fp = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, HPPA_FP_REGNUM);
+
+ if (frame_pc_unwind (next_frame) >= prologue_end
+ && u->Save_SP && fp != 0)
+ {
+ cache->base = fp;
+
+ if (hppa_debug)
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " (base=0x%s) [frame pointer] }",
+ paddr_nz (cache->base));
+ }
+ else if (frame_pc_unwind (next_frame) >= prologue_end)
{
if (u->Save_SP && trad_frame_addr_p (cache->saved_regs, HPPA_SP_REGNUM))
{