Fixes #3729 and fixes #3720.
This updates two more stages of check-model (checking whether values assigned to terms are constants and internally checking whether assertions belonging to theories) to only throw warnings when a term/assertion has a non-constant value in the model. This is to accommodate cases where check-model is infeasible.
}
// (2) check that the value is actually a value
- else if (!val.isConst()) {
- Notice() << "SmtEngine::checkModel(): *** PROBLEM: MODEL VALUE NOT A CONSTANT ***" << endl;
- InternalError()
- << "SmtEngine::checkModel(): ERRORS SATISFYING ASSERTIONS WITH "
- "MODEL:"
- << endl
- << "model value for " << func << endl
- << " is " << val << endl
- << "and that is not a constant (.isConst() == false)." << endl
- << "Run with `--check-models -v' for additional diagnostics.";
+ else if (!val.isConst())
+ {
+ // This is only a warning since it could have been assigned an
+ // unevaluable term (e.g. an application of a transcendental function).
+ // This parallels the behavior (warnings for non-constant expressions)
+ // when checking whether assertions are satisfied below.
+ Warning() << "Warning : SmtEngine::checkModel(): "
+ << "model value for " << func << endl
+ << " is " << val << endl
+ << "and that is not a constant (.isConst() == false)."
+ << std::endl
+ << "Run with `--check-models -v' for additional diagnostics."
+ << std::endl;
}
// (3) check that it's the correct (sub)type
Node val = getModel()->getValue(assertion);
if (val != d_true)
{
+ std::stringstream ss;
+ ss << theoryId
+ << " has an asserted fact that the model doesn't satisfy." << endl
+ << "The fact: " << assertion << endl
+ << "Model value: " << val << endl;
if (hardFailure)
{
- InternalError()
- << theoryId
- << " has an asserted fact that the model doesn't satisfy."
- << endl
- << "The fact: " << assertion << endl
- << "Model value: " << val << endl;
+ if (val == d_false)
+ {
+ // Always an error if it is false
+ InternalError() << ss.str();
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ // Otherwise just a warning. Notice this case may happen for
+ // assertions with unevaluable operators, e.g. transcendental
+ // functions. It also may happen for separation logic, where
+ // check-model support is limited.
+ Warning() << ss.str();
+ }
}
}
}
regress0/nl/issue3652.smt2
regress0/nl/issue3718.smt2
regress0/nl/issue3719.smt2
+ regress0/nl/issue3729-cm-solved-tf.smt2
regress0/nl/magnitude-wrong-1020-m.smt2
regress0/nl/mult-po.smt2
regress0/nl/nia-wrong-tl.smt2
regress0/reset-assertions.smt2
regress0/sep/dispose-1.smt2
regress0/sep/dup-nemp.smt2
+ regress0/sep/issue3720-check-model.smt2
regress0/sep/nemp.smt2
regress0/sep/nil-no-elim.smt2
regress0/sep/nspatial-simp.smt2
--- /dev/null
+; COMMAND-LINE: --quiet
+; EXPECT: sat
+(set-logic QF_NRAT)
+(set-info :status sat)
+(declare-fun a () Real)
+(assert (= a (sin 1.0)))
+(check-sat)
--- /dev/null
+; COMMAND-LINE: --quiet
+; EXPECT: sat
+(set-logic ALL)
+(assert (_ emp Int Int))
+(check-sat)