A recent change to cmcstl2 led to two tests failing due to this bug: our
valid expression checking in the context of a requires-expression wasn't
catching that an expression of member function type can only appear as the
function operand of a call expression. Fixed by using convert_to_void to do
the same checking as a discarded-value expression.
This patch also fixes 67825, which already had a testcase, but the testcase
was testing for the wrong behavior.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-04-04 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/67825
* constraint.cc (tsubst_valid_expression_requirement): Call
convert_to_void.
+2020-04-04 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/67825
+ * constraint.cc (tsubst_valid_expression_requirement): Call
+ convert_to_void.
+
2020-04-04 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/94453
static tree
tsubst_valid_expression_requirement (tree t, tree args, subst_info info)
{
- return tsubst_expr (t, args, info.complain, info.in_decl, false);
+ tree r = tsubst_expr (t, args, info.complain, info.in_decl, false);
+ if (convert_to_void (r, ICV_STATEMENT, info.complain) == error_mark_node)
+ return error_mark_node;
+ return r;
}
--- /dev/null
+// Make sure that the requirement fails because a .* expression of function
+// type can only be used in a call.
+
+// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
+
+template<class D, class T>
+constexpr decltype(auto) invoke(D (T::*pmd), T&& t)
+ noexcept(noexcept(t.*pmd))
+ requires requires { t.*pmd; }
+ { return t.*pmd; }
+
+char invoke(...);
+
+struct A
+{
+ int f();
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+ static_assert(sizeof(invoke (&A::f, A())) == 1);
+}
}
int main() {
- static_assert(C<A>());
+ static_assert(!C<A>());
return 0;
}