[PATCH, rs6000] Fix expected error output for test case.

r264355 removed some spelling suggestions including for "bool" as used
in this test case.

Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and
powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions.  Is this ok for trunk?

2018-10-04  Bill Seurer  <seurer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

	PR target/87486
	* gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c: Fix expected error output.

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c	(revision 264812)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c	(working copy)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@

 #include <xmmintrin.h>

-bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'; did you mean '_Bool'?" } */
+bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'" } */
 {
   return x == 2;
 }

From-SVN: r264847

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 7da77d1d4c4f446382afaebba123f028d86b9dd9..cd10feec8b389b8b434500fc8686f0f746b03a6d 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-10-04  Bill Seurer  <seurer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+
+       PR target/87486
+       * gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c: Fix expected error output.
+
 2018-10-04  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
 
        PR c/87483

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c
index bb8e4260aa0a962daeba83667b9ca0cf932443fe..d4944ab1ca6c7b3c16419c2622a5555613063875 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/undef-bool-2.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 #include <xmmintrin.h>
 
-bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'; did you mean '_Bool'?" } */
+bool foo (int x) /* { dg-error "unknown type name 'bool'" } */
 {
   return x == 2;
 }