**Notes and Observations**:
-1. TODO
+1. Although costly the alternatives in SIMD-paradigm software result in
+ huge algorithmic complexity and associated power consumption increases.
+ Loop-unrolling compilers are prevalent as is thousands to tens of
+ thousands of instructions.
+2. Core inner kernels of Matrix DCT DFT FFT NTT are dramatically reduced
+ to a handful of instructions.
+3. No REMAP instructions with the exception of Indexed rely on registers
+ for the establishment of REMAP capability.
+4. Future EXT1xx variants and SVP64/VSX will dramatically expand the power
+ and flexibility of REMAP.
+5. The Simple-V Compliancy Subsets make REMAP optional except in the
+ Advanced Levels. Like v3.1 MMA it is **not** necessary for **all**
+ hardware to implement REMAP.
**Changes**