gcc-6.2.1-2.fc24.x86_64
(gdb) backtrace 10^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp: backtrace 10
(gdb) disas/s
Dump of assembler code for function main:
.../gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-signal.c:
30 {
0x000000000040057f <+0>: push %rbp
0x0000000000400580 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp
31 setup ();
0x0000000000400583 <+4>: callq 0x400590 <setup>
=> 0x0000000000400588 <+9>: mov $0x0,%eax
32 }
0x000000000040058d <+14>: pop %rbp
0x000000000040058e <+15>: retq
End of assembler dump.
The .exp patch is an obvious typo fix I think. The regex was written to
accept "ADDR in main" and I find it OK as checking .debug_line validity is not
the purpose of this testfile.
gcc-4.8.5-11.el7.x86_64 did not put the 'mov $0x0,%eax' instruction there at
all so there was no problem with .debug_line.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-10-05 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp (backtrace 10): Fix #2 typo.
+2016-10-05 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+ * gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp (backtrace 10): Fix #2 typo.
+
2016-10-05 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* lib/gdb.exp (support_complex_tests): Return zero if
runto func
gdb_test "backtrace 10" \
- "#0 ($hex in )?func.*\r\n#1 <signal handler called>\r\n#2 ($hex in)?main.*"
+ "#0 ($hex in )?func.*\r\n#1 <signal handler called>\r\n#2 ($hex in )?main.*"
gdb_test "finish" "Run till exit from \#0 func.*<signal handler called>"