return lmp;
}
+
+/* Macros for matching instructions. Note that, since all the
+ operands are masked off before they're or-ed into the instruction,
+ you can use -1 to make masks. */
+
+#define insn_d(opcd, rts, ra, d) \
+ ((((opcd) & 0x3f) << 26) \
+ | (((rts) & 0x1f) << 21) \
+ | (((ra) & 0x1f) << 16) \
+ | ((d) & 0xffff))
+
+#define insn_ds(opcd, rts, ra, d, xo) \
+ ((((opcd) & 0x3f) << 26) \
+ | (((rts) & 0x1f) << 21) \
+ | (((ra) & 0x1f) << 16) \
+ | ((d) & 0xfffc) \
+ | ((xo) & 0x3))
+
+#define insn_xfx(opcd, rts, spr, xo) \
+ ((((opcd) & 0x3f) << 26) \
+ | (((rts) & 0x1f) << 21) \
+ | (((spr) & 0x1f) << 16) \
+ | (((spr) & 0x3e0) << 6) \
+ | (((xo) & 0x3ff) << 1))
+
+/* Read a PPC instruction from memory. PPC instructions are always
+ big-endian, no matter what endianness the program is running in, so
+ we can't use read_memory_integer or one of its friends here. */
+static unsigned int
+read_insn (CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ unsigned char buf[4];
+
+ read_memory (pc, buf, 4);
+ return (buf[0] << 24) | (buf[1] << 16) | (buf[2] << 8) | buf[3];
+}
+
+
+/* An instruction to match. */
+struct insn_pattern
+{
+ unsigned int mask; /* mask the insn with this... */
+ unsigned int data; /* ...and see if it matches this. */
+ int optional; /* If non-zero, this insn may be absent. */
+};
+
+/* Return non-zero if the instructions at PC match the series
+ described in PATTERN, or zero otherwise. PATTERN is an array of
+ 'struct insn_pattern' objects, terminated by an entry whose mask is
+ zero.
+
+ When the match is successful, fill INSN[i] with what PATTERN[i]
+ matched. If PATTERN[i] is optional, and the instruction wasn't
+ present, set INSN[i] to 0 (which is not a valid PPC instruction).
+ INSN should have as many elements as PATTERN. Note that, if
+ PATTERN contains optional instructions which aren't present in
+ memory, then INSN will have holes, so INSN[i] isn't necessarily the
+ i'th instruction in memory. */
+static int
+insns_match_pattern (CORE_ADDR pc,
+ struct insn_pattern *pattern,
+ unsigned int *insn)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; pattern[i].mask; i++)
+ {
+ insn[i] = read_insn (pc);
+ if ((insn[i] & pattern[i].mask) == pattern[i].data)
+ pc += 4;
+ else if (pattern[i].optional)
+ insn[i] = 0;
+ else
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+
+/* Return the 'd' field of the d-form instruction INSN, properly
+ sign-extended. */
+static CORE_ADDR
+insn_d_field (unsigned int insn)
+{
+ return ((((CORE_ADDR) insn & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000);
+}
+
+
+/* Return the 'ds' field of the ds-form instruction INSN, with the two
+ zero bits concatenated at the right, and properly
+ sign-extended. */
+static CORE_ADDR
+insn_ds_field (unsigned int insn)
+{
+ return ((((CORE_ADDR) insn & 0xfffc) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000);
+}
+
+
+/* Pattern for the standard linkage function. These are built by
+ build_plt_stub in elf64-ppc.c, whose GLINK argument is always
+ zero. */
+static struct insn_pattern ppc64_standard_linkage[] =
+ {
+ /* addis r12, r2, <any> */
+ { insn_d (-1, -1, -1, 0), insn_d (15, 12, 2, 0), 0 },
+
+ /* std r2, 40(r1) */
+ { -1, insn_ds (62, 2, 1, 40, 0), 0 },
+
+ /* ld r11, <any>(r12) */
+ { insn_ds (-1, -1, -1, 0, -1), insn_ds (58, 11, 12, 0, 0), 0 },
+
+ /* addis r12, r12, 1 <optional> */
+ { insn_d (-1, -1, -1, -1), insn_d (15, 12, 2, 1), 1 },
+
+ /* ld r2, <any>(r12) */
+ { insn_ds (-1, -1, -1, 0, -1), insn_ds (58, 2, 12, 0, 0), 0 },
+
+ /* addis r12, r12, 1 <optional> */
+ { insn_d (-1, -1, -1, -1), insn_d (15, 12, 2, 1), 1 },
+
+ /* mtctr r11 */
+ { insn_xfx (-1, -1, -1, -1), insn_xfx (31, 11, 9, 467),
+ 0 },
+
+ /* ld r11, <any>(r12) */
+ { insn_ds (-1, -1, -1, 0, -1), insn_ds (58, 11, 12, 0, 0), 0 },
+
+ /* bctr */
+ { -1, 0x4e800420, 0 },
+
+ { 0, 0, 0 }
+ };
+#define PPC64_STANDARD_LINKAGE_LEN \
+ (sizeof (ppc64_standard_linkage) / sizeof (ppc64_standard_linkage[0]))
+
+
+/* Recognize a 64-bit PowerPC Linux linkage function --- what GDB
+ calls a "solib trampoline". */
+static int
+ppc64_in_solib_call_trampoline (CORE_ADDR pc, char *name)
+{
+ /* Detecting solib call trampolines on PPC64 Linux is a pain.
+
+ It's not specifically solib call trampolines that are the issue.
+ Any call from one function to another function that uses a
+ different TOC requires a trampoline, to save the caller's TOC
+ pointer and then load the callee's TOC. An executable or shared
+ library may have more than one TOC, so even intra-object calls
+ may require a trampoline. Since executable and shared libraries
+ will all have their own distinct TOCs, every inter-object call is
+ also an inter-TOC call, and requires a trampoline --- so "solib
+ call trampolines" are just a special case.
+
+ The 64-bit PowerPC Linux ABI calls these call trampolines
+ "linkage functions". Since they need to be near the functions
+ that call them, they all appear in .text, not in any special
+ section. The .plt section just contains an array of function
+ descriptors, from which the linkage functions load the callee's
+ entry point, TOC value, and environment pointer. So
+ in_plt_section is useless. The linkage functions don't have any
+ special linker symbols to name them, either.
+
+ The only way I can see to recognize them is to actually look at
+ their code. They're generated by ppc_build_one_stub and some
+ other functions in bfd/elf64-ppc.c, so that should show us all
+ the instruction sequences we need to recognize. */
+ unsigned int insn[PPC64_STANDARD_LINKAGE_LEN];
+
+ return insns_match_pattern (pc, ppc64_standard_linkage, insn);
+}
+
+
+/* When the dynamic linker is doing lazy symbol resolution, the first
+ call to a function in another object will go like this:
+
+ - The user's function calls the linkage function:
+
+ 100007c4: 4b ff fc d5 bl 10000498
+ 100007c8: e8 41 00 28 ld r2,40(r1)
+
+ - The linkage function loads the entry point (and other stuff) from
+ the function descriptor in the PLT, and jumps to it:
+
+ 10000498: 3d 82 00 00 addis r12,r2,0
+ 1000049c: f8 41 00 28 std r2,40(r1)
+ 100004a0: e9 6c 80 98 ld r11,-32616(r12)
+ 100004a4: e8 4c 80 a0 ld r2,-32608(r12)
+ 100004a8: 7d 69 03 a6 mtctr r11
+ 100004ac: e9 6c 80 a8 ld r11,-32600(r12)
+ 100004b0: 4e 80 04 20 bctr
+
+ - But since this is the first time that PLT entry has been used, it
+ sends control to its glink entry. That loads the number of the
+ PLT entry and jumps to the common glink0 code:
+
+ 10000c98: 38 00 00 00 li r0,0
+ 10000c9c: 4b ff ff dc b 10000c78
+
+ - The common glink0 code then transfers control to the dynamic
+ linker's fixup code:
+
+ 10000c78: e8 41 00 28 ld r2,40(r1)
+ 10000c7c: 3d 82 00 00 addis r12,r2,0
+ 10000c80: e9 6c 80 80 ld r11,-32640(r12)
+ 10000c84: e8 4c 80 88 ld r2,-32632(r12)
+ 10000c88: 7d 69 03 a6 mtctr r11
+ 10000c8c: e9 6c 80 90 ld r11,-32624(r12)
+ 10000c90: 4e 80 04 20 bctr
+
+ Eventually, this code will figure out how to skip all of this,
+ including the dynamic linker. At the moment, we just get through
+ the linkage function. */
+
+/* If the current thread is about to execute a series of instructions
+ at PC matching the ppc64_standard_linkage pattern, and INSN is the result
+ from that pattern match, return the code address to which the
+ standard linkage function will send them. (This doesn't deal with
+ dynamic linker lazy symbol resolution stubs.) */
+static CORE_ADDR
+ppc64_standard_linkage_target (CORE_ADDR pc, unsigned int *insn)
+{
+ struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
+
+ /* The address of the function descriptor this linkage function
+ references. */
+ CORE_ADDR desc
+ = ((CORE_ADDR) read_register (tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + 2)
+ + (insn_d_field (insn[0]) << 16)
+ + insn_ds_field (insn[2]));
+
+ /* The first word of the descriptor is the entry point. Return that. */
+ return (CORE_ADDR) read_memory_unsigned_integer (desc, 8);
+}
+
+
+/* Given that we've begun executing a call trampoline at PC, return
+ the entry point of the function the trampoline will go to. */
+static CORE_ADDR
+ppc64_skip_trampoline_code (CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ unsigned int ppc64_standard_linkage_insn[PPC64_STANDARD_LINKAGE_LEN];
+
+ if (insns_match_pattern (pc, ppc64_standard_linkage,
+ ppc64_standard_linkage_insn))
+ return ppc64_standard_linkage_target (pc, ppc64_standard_linkage_insn);
+ else
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
enum {
ELF_NGREG = 48,
ELF_NFPREG = 33,
set_gdbarch_memory_remove_breakpoint (gdbarch,
ppc_linux_memory_remove_breakpoint);
+ /* Shared library handling. */
+ set_gdbarch_in_solib_call_trampoline (gdbarch, in_plt_section);
+ set_gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code (gdbarch,
+ ppc_linux_skip_trampoline_code);
set_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets
(gdbarch, ppc_linux_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets);
}
-
- /* Shared library handling. */
- set_gdbarch_in_solib_call_trampoline (gdbarch, in_plt_section);
- set_gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code (gdbarch, ppc_linux_skip_trampoline_code);
+
+ if (tdep->wordsize == 8)
+ {
+ set_gdbarch_in_solib_call_trampoline
+ (gdbarch, ppc64_in_solib_call_trampoline);
+ set_gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code (gdbarch, ppc64_skip_trampoline_code);
+ }
}
void
projects / binutils-gdb.git / commitdiff