Currently, the DWARF description does not specify the signedness of the
representation of enumeration types. This is a problem in some
contexts where DWARF consumers need to determine if value X is greater
than value Y.
For instance in Ada:
type Enum_Type is ( A, B, C, D);
for Enum_Type use (-1, 0, 1, 2);
type Rec_Type (E : Enum_Type) is record
when A .. B => null;
when others => B : Booleann;
end record;
The above can be described in DWARF the following way:
DW_TAG_enumeration_type(Enum_Type)
| DW_AT_byte_size: 1
DW_TAG_enumerator(A)
| DW_AT_const_value: -1
DW_TAG_enumerator(B)
| DW_AT_const_value: 0
DW_TAG_enumerator(C)
| DW_AT_const_value: 1
DW_TAG_enumerator(D)
| DW_AT_const_value: 2
DW_TAG_structure_type(Rec_Type)
DW_TAG_member(E)
| DW_AT_type: <Enum_Type>
DW_TAG_variant_part
| DW_AT_discr: <E>
DW_TAG_variant
| DW_AT_discr_list: DW_DSC_range 0x7f 0
DW_TAG_variant
| DW_TAG_member(b)
DWARF consumers need to know that enumerators (A, B, C and D) are signed
in order to determine the set of E values for which Rec_Type has a B
field. In practice, they need to know how to interpret the 0x7f LEB128
number above (-1, not 127).
When in non-strict DWARF mode, this patch adds a DW_AT_encoding
attribute to generated DW_TAG_enumeration_type DIEs to make this
signedness explicit.
gcc/
* dwarf2out.c (gen_enumeration_type_die): When
-gno-strict-dwarf, add a DW_AT_encoding attribute.
From-SVN: r244015
+2017-01-03 Pierre-Marie de Rodat <derodat@adacore.com>
+
+ * dwarf2out.c (gen_enumeration_type_die): When
+ -gno-strict-dwarf, add a DW_AT_encoding attribute.
+
2017-01-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/78965
if (ENUM_IS_OPAQUE (type))
add_AT_flag (type_die, DW_AT_declaration, 1);
}
+ if (!dwarf_strict)
+ add_AT_unsigned (type_die, DW_AT_encoding,
+ TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
+ ? DW_ATE_unsigned
+ : DW_ATE_signed);
}
else if (! TYPE_SIZE (type))
return type_die;