In the testcase below, during specialization of c<int>::d, we build two
identical specializations of the parameter type b<decltype(e)::k> -- one when
substituting into c<int>::d's TYPE_ARG_TYPES and another when substituting into
c<int>::d's DECL_ARGUMENTS.
We don't reuse the first specialization the second time around as a consequence
of the fix for PR c++/56247 which made PARM_DECLs always compare different from
one another during spec_hasher::equal. As a result, when looking up existing
specializations of 'b', spec_hasher::equal considers the template argument
decltype(e')::k to be different from decltype(e'')::k, where e' and e'' are the
result of two calls to tsubst_copy on the PARM_DECL e.
Since the two specializations are considered different due to the mentioned fix,
their TYPE_CANONICAL points to themselves even though they are otherwise
identical types, and this triggers an ICE in maybe_rebuild_function_decl_type
when comparing the TYPE_ARG_TYPES of c<int>::d to its DECL_ARGUMENTS.
This patch fixes this issue at the spec_hasher::equal level by ignoring the
'comparing_specializations' flag in cp_tree_equal whenever the DECL_CONTEXTs of
the two parameters are identical. This seems to be a sufficient condition to be
able to correctly compare PARM_DECLs structurally. (This also subsumes the
CONSTRAINT_VAR_P check since constraint variables all have empty, and therefore
identical, DECL_CONTEXTs.)
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94632
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal) <case PARM_DECL>: Ignore
comparing_specializations if the parameters' contexts are identical.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94632
* g++.dg/template/canon-type-14.C: New test.
2020-04-18 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+ PR c++/94632
+ * tree.c (cp_tree_equal) <case PARM_DECL>: Ignore
+ comparing_specializations if the parameters' contexts are identical.
+
PR c++/92187
* pt.c (splice_late_return_type): Propagate cv-qualifiers and
PLACEHOLDER_TYPE_CONSTRAINTS from the original auto node to the new one.
up for expressions that involve 'this' in a member function
template. */
- if (comparing_specializations && !CONSTRAINT_VAR_P (t1))
+ if (comparing_specializations
+ && DECL_CONTEXT (t1) != DECL_CONTEXT (t2))
/* When comparing hash table entries, only an exact match is
good enough; we don't want to replace 'this' with the
version from another function. But be more flexible
- with local parameters in a requires-expression. */
+ with parameters with identical contexts. */
return false;
if (same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (t1), TREE_TYPE (t2)))
2020-04-18 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+ PR c++/94632
+ * g++.dg/template/canon-type-14.C: New test.
+
PR c++/92187
* g++.dg/concepts/abbrev5.C: New test.
* g++.dg/concepts/abbrev6.C: New test.
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/94632
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <bool> struct b;
+template <typename> class c {
+ template <typename f> static void d(f e, b<decltype(e)::k>);
+};
+template class c<int>;