Here we crash in the gimplifier because gimplify_init_ctor_eval doesn't
expect null indexes for a constructor:
/* ??? Here's to hoping the front end fills in all of the indices,
so we don't have to figure out what's missing ourselves. */
gcc_assert (purpose);
The indexes weren't filled because we never called reshape_init: for
a constructor that represents parenthesized initialization of an
aggregate we don't allow brace elision or designated initializers.
PR c++/94155 - crash in gimplifier with paren init of aggregates.
* init.c (build_vec_init): Fill in indexes.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/paren-init22.C: New test.
+2020-04-04 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
+ Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94155 - crash in gimplifier with paren init of aggregates.
+ * init.c (build_vec_init): Fill in indexes.
+
2020-04-04 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/91377
errors = true;
if (try_const)
{
+ if (!field)
+ field = size_int (idx);
tree e = maybe_constant_init (one_init);
if (reduced_constant_expression_p (e))
{
+2020-04-04 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94155 - crash in gimplifier with paren init of aggregates.
+ * g++.dg/cpp2a/paren-init22.C: New test.
+
2020-04-05 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
* g++.dg/coroutines/torture/co-await-14-template-traits.C: Rename...
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/94155 - crash in gimplifier with paren init of aggregates.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+
+struct S { int i, j; };
+
+struct A {
+ S s;
+ constexpr A(S e) : s(e) {}
+};
+
+void
+f()
+{
+ A g[1]({{1, 1}});
+}