This was broken by
4ade44b727ee77adaa9c22719935d012e253a5e6,
which changed the calculation to use the .rela.plt linker section
instead of its output section - thus skipping .rela.iplt .
Fix the calculations to include it.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_finish_dynamic_sections): Include
.rela.iplt in DT_PLTRELSZ.
* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_finish_dynamic_sections): Likewise,
for DT_PLTRELSZ and DT_RELASZ as well.
+2016-06-16 Marcin Kościelnicki <koriakin@0x04.net>
+
+ * elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_finish_dynamic_sections): Include
+ .rela.iplt in DT_PLTRELSZ.
+ * elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_finish_dynamic_sections): Likewise,
+ for DT_PLTRELSZ and DT_RELASZ as well.
+
2016-06-16 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_check_relocs): Skip relocations in
break;
case DT_PLTRELSZ:
- s = htab->elf.srelplt;
- dyn.d_un.d_val = s->size;
+ dyn.d_un.d_val = htab->elf.srelplt->size + htab->elf.irelplt->size;
break;
}
break;
case DT_PLTRELSZ:
- s = htab->elf.srelplt;
- dyn.d_un.d_val = s->size;
+ dyn.d_un.d_val = htab->elf.srelplt->size + htab->elf.irelplt->size;
break;
case DT_RELASZ:
linker script arranges for .rela.plt to follow all
other relocation sections, we don't have to worry
about changing the DT_RELA entry. */
- s = htab->elf.srelplt;
- dyn.d_un.d_val -= s->size;
+ dyn.d_un.d_val -= htab->elf.srelplt->size + htab->elf.irelplt->size;
break;
}