PR python/29217 points out that gdb.parameter will return bool values,
but gdb.set_parameter will not properly accept them. This patch fixes
the problem by adding a special case to set_parameter.
I looked at a fix involving rewriting set_parameter in C++. However,
this one is simpler.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29217
def set_parameter(name, value):
"""Set the GDB parameter NAME to VALUE."""
+ # Handle the specific case of booleans here, because gdb.parameter
+ # can return them, but they can't be passed to 'set' this way.
+ if isinstance(value, bool):
+ if value:
+ value = 'on'
+ else:
+ value = 'off'
execute("set " + name + " " + str(value), to_string=True)
"The state of the Test Parameter is off.*" "show parameter off"
gdb_test "python print (test_param.value)" "False" \
"test boolean parameter value is False"
+ gdb_test_no_output "python gdb.set_parameter('print test-param', True)" \
+ "set boolean parameter using set_parameter"
+ gdb_test "python print(gdb.parameter('print test-param'))" "True" \
+ "get boolean parameter using gdb.parameter"
gdb_test "help show print test-param" \
[multi_line \
"Show the state of the boolean test-param" \