meeting suggested adding shaddw while keeping shadduw
authorJacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com>
Thu, 9 Feb 2023 01:35:00 +0000 (17:35 -0800)
committerJacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com>
Thu, 9 Feb 2023 01:35:00 +0000 (17:35 -0800)
openpower/sv/rfc/ls004.mdwn

index 8cedcdc3680cb2035e7121396e495c52cce87107..008ab56f92e45b678bfb91bfd5ebcd591b5c5d0e 100644 (file)
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 * bigint: <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960> TODO: maybe remove this link due to confusion and irrelevance?
 * <https://git.openpower.foundation/isa/PowerISA/issues/91>
 * shift-and-add <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=968>
-* <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996>
+* add shaddw: <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996>
 
 **Severity**: Major
 
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Replaces a pair of explicit instructions in hot-loops.
    and zero-extended.
 3. Both are 2-in 1-out instructions.
 
-TODO: signed 32-bit shift-and-add should probably be added or replace shadduw, this needs to be addressed before submitting the RFC: <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996>
+TODO: signed 32-bit shift-and-add should be added, this needs to be addressed before submitting the RFC: <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=996>
 
 **Changes**