+2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/84394
+ * symbol.c (gfc_add_subroutine): If we are encountering a
+ subrtoutine within a BLOCK DATA and the name starts with an
+ underscore, do not check.
+
2019-03-15 Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
PR fortran/60091
2019-03-14 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
* gfortran.texi: Document Q edit descriptor under
- " Extensions not implemented in GNU Fortran".
+ "Extensions not implemented in GNU Fortran".
2019-03-13 Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
return false;
attr->subroutine = 1;
- return check_conflict (attr, name, where);
+
+ /* If we are looking at a BLOCK DATA statement and we encounter a
+ name with a leading underscore (which must be
+ compiler-generated), do not check. See PR 84394. */
+
+ if (name && *name != '_' && gfc_current_state () != COMP_BLOCK_DATA)
+ return check_conflict (attr, name, where);
+ else
+ return true;
}
+2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/84394
+ * gfortran.dg/blockdata_11.f90: New test.
+
2019-03-15 Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
PR fortran/60091
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do run }
+! PR 84394 - this used to complain about private procedures in
+! BLOCK data.
+module mod1
+ implicit none
+ type :: type1
+ integer :: i1
+ end type type1
+end module
+
+module mod2
+ implicit none
+ contains
+ subroutine sub1
+ integer vals
+ common /block1/ vals(5)
+ if (any(vals /= [1, 2, 3, 4, 5])) stop 1
+ end subroutine
+end module
+
+block data blkdat
+ use mod1
+ integer vals
+ common /block1/ vals(5)
+ data vals/1, 2, 3, 4, 5/
+end block data blkdat
+
+program main
+ use mod2, only: sub1
+ implicit none
+ call sub1
+end program
+