I noticed that in some concepts diagnostic messages, we were printing typename
types incorrectly, e.g. printing remove_reference_t<T> as
typename remove_reference<T>::remove_reference_t
instead of
typename remove_reference<T>::type.
Fix this by printing the TYPENAME_TYPE_FULLNAME instead of the TYPE_NAME in
cxx_pretty_printer::simple_type_specifier, which is consistent with how
dump_typename in error.c does it.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cxx-pretty-print.c (cxx_pretty_printer::simple_type_specifier)
[TYPENAME_TYPE]: Print the TYPENAME_TYPE_FULLNAME instead of the
TYPE_NAME.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic4.C: New test.
+2020-03-08 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+
+ * cxx-pretty-print.c (cxx_pretty_printer::simple_type_specifier)
+ [TYPENAME_TYPE]: Print the TYPENAME_TYPE_FULLNAME instead of the
+ TYPE_NAME.
+
2020-03-06 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
PR c++/94027
case TYPENAME_TYPE:
pp_cxx_ws_string (this, "typename");
pp_cxx_nested_name_specifier (this, TYPE_CONTEXT (t));
- pp_cxx_unqualified_id (this, TYPE_NAME (t));
+ pp_cxx_unqualified_id (this, TYPENAME_TYPE_FULLNAME (t));
break;
default:
+2020-03-08 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+
+ * g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic4.C: New test.
+
2020-03-08 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR target/89229
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+
+template<typename T>
+ struct remove_reference
+ { using type = T; };
+
+template<typename T>
+ using remove_reference_t = remove_reference<T>::type;
+
+template<typename T>
+ inline constexpr bool blah = false;
+
+template<typename T>
+ requires blah<remove_reference_t<T>>
+ // { dg-message "typename remove_reference<T>::type" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+ void foo() { }
+
+void bar() { foo<int> (); } // { dg-error "use of" }