+2002-08-09 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
+
+ * mips-tdep.c (mips_init_extra_frame_info): Initialize SP_REGNUM's
+ saved regs value.
+ (read_next_frame_reg): Call FRAME_INIT_SAVED_REGS instead of
+ mips_find_saved_regs().
+ (mips_pop_frame): Likewise.
+
2002-08-09 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
* blockframe.c (frame_saved_regs_register_unwind): Revise
}
/* Guaranteed to set fci->saved_regs to some values (it never leaves it
- NULL). */
+ NULL).
+
+ Note: kevinb/2002-08-09: The only caller of this function is (and
+ should remain) mips_frame_init_saved_regs(). In fact,
+ aside from calling mips_find_saved_regs(), mips_frame_init_saved_regs()
+ does nothing more than set frame->saved_regs[SP_REGNUM]. These two
+ functions should really be combined and now that there is only one
+ caller, it should be straightforward. (Watch out for multiple returns
+ though.)
+*/
static void
mips_find_saved_regs (struct frame_info *fci)
else
{
if (fi->saved_regs == NULL)
- mips_find_saved_regs (fi);
+ FRAME_INIT_SAVED_REGS (fi);
if (fi->saved_regs[regno])
return read_memory_integer (ADDR_BITS_REMOVE (fi->saved_regs[regno]), MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE);
}
memcpy (fci->saved_regs, temp_saved_regs, SIZEOF_FRAME_SAVED_REGS);
fci->saved_regs[PC_REGNUM]
= fci->saved_regs[RA_REGNUM];
+ /* Set value of previous frame's stack pointer. Remember that
+ saved_regs[SP_REGNUM] is special in that it contains the
+ value of the stack pointer register. The other saved_regs
+ values are addresses (in the inferior) at which a given
+ register's value may be found. */
+ fci->saved_regs[SP_REGNUM] = fci->frame;
}
}
write_register (PC_REGNUM, FRAME_SAVED_PC (frame));
if (frame->saved_regs == NULL)
- mips_find_saved_regs (frame);
+ FRAME_INIT_SAVED_REGS (frame);
for (regnum = 0; regnum < NUM_REGS; regnum++)
{
if (regnum != SP_REGNUM && regnum != PC_REGNUM