From: Jason Merrill Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:47:43 +0000 (-0400) Subject: re PR c++/48089 ([C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors) X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=00a0d6f3590e0e9891fc01d21667de892d6a89c6;p=gcc.git re PR c++/48089 ([C++0x] ICE on in(?)valid in constexpr constructors) PR c++/48089 * semantics.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Change error about use of *this in constructor into sorry. From-SVN: r171687 --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index 1ffe70b3933..3d0c02a44fa 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 2011-03-29 Jason Merrill + PR c++/48089 + * semantics.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Change error about + use of *this in constructor into sorry. + PR c++/48296 * decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Defer validation of constexpr member functions. diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c index f1c3d9af300..5a659434de6 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c @@ -7495,8 +7495,8 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t, bool want_rval, tsubst_flags_t flags) if (DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (DECL_CONTEXT (x)) && want_rval) { if (flags & tf_error) - error ("the value of the object being constructed is " - "not a constant expression"); + sorry ("use of the value of the object being constructed " + "in a constant expression"); return false; } return true; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 5cb4f4e2cb6..fbd21e5d3a4 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ 2011-03-29 Jason Merrill + * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-48089.C: Adjust. + * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-memfn1.C: New. * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-diag1.C: Adjust error locations. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-48089.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-48089.C index 88ef3d685d3..fc69cfef678 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-48089.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-48089.C @@ -1,9 +1,24 @@ // PR c++/48089 // { dg-options -std=c++0x } +// bang is ill-formed (diagnostic required) because its initializer is +// non-constant, because it uses the value of an uninitialized object. + +// s() is ill-formed (no diagnostic required) because there is no set of +// arguments that would produce a constant expression. + +// R() is well-formed because i is initialized before j. + struct s { - constexpr s() : v(v) { } // { dg-error "object being constructed" } - char v; + constexpr s() : v(v) { } // { dg-message "" } + int v; +}; + +constexpr s bang; // { dg-error "" } + +struct R { + int i,j; + constexpr R() : i(42),j(i) { } // { dg-bogus "" "" { xfail *-*-* } } }; -s bang; +constexpr R r; // { dg-bogus "" "" { xfail *-*-* } }